Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Politicisation and Coalition Magnets in Policy Making: A Comparative Study of Food Sovereignty and Agricultural Reform in Nepal and Ecuador

Sharma, Puspa; Daugbjerg, Carsten

Description

Politicisation can be a strategy in which reform advocates use new ideas with coalition magnet attributes to engage a broad range of actors in setting the agenda for policy reform. Comparing the cases of Ecuador and Nepal, the article shows that the generally appealing but ambiguous idea of food sovereignty is a coalition magnet. Through politicisation, agriculture reform advocates in the two countries used the idea to form coalitions of diverse groups supporting reform. But due to the idea's...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2020
Type: Journal article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/268872
Source: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis
DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1760716

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Politicisation and Coalition Magnets in Policy Making A Comparative Study of Food Sovereignty and Agricultural Reform in Nepal and Ecuador.pdf590.67 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator