Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Tools for NRM: Linking investments to outcomes

Pollino, Carmel; Lefroy, E.C.; Jakeman, Anthony

Description

Since the emergence of national natural resource management programs, there have been few tools that can assist regional bodies in planning, monitoring and evaluating the success of investments. Tools are needed to assist natural resource managers in better focusing investments, more efficiently allocating scare resources available to regional bodies and demonstrating ongoing improvements in resource condition. Such tools should also be underpinned by robust scientific analysis and promote...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorPollino, Carmel
dc.contributor.authorLefroy, E.C.
dc.contributor.authorJakeman, Anthony
dc.coverage.spatialCairns Australia
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:44:37Z
dc.date.createdJuly 13-17 2009
dc.identifier.isbn9780975840078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/25269
dc.description.abstractSince the emergence of national natural resource management programs, there have been few tools that can assist regional bodies in planning, monitoring and evaluating the success of investments. Tools are needed to assist natural resource managers in better focusing investments, more efficiently allocating scare resources available to regional bodies and demonstrating ongoing improvements in resource condition. Such tools should also be underpinned by robust scientific analysis and promote enhanced understanding of cause and effect through adaptive learning. In order to credibly characterize the links between investments and outcomes, we suggest four key steps: a participatory systems thinking approach is needed to define problems; a strong evidence-base is required to further characterise links between cause and effect (e.g. investments and outcomes); sensitivity assessment is required to simplify relationships to the core controlling variables and identify a suite of interventions likely to achieve the desired outcomes; and the impact of interventions need to be updated through a process of adaptive learning, involving follow up monitoring and modelling review. Clearly, developing such a suite of tools is a substantial exercise. This challenge is the focus of the research hub Landscape Logic (www.landscapelogic.org.au), funded by the Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities program. In Landscape Logic we are using a suite of tools to link investments to outcomes, through analysis of cause and effect. Our focus issues are water quality and native vegetation condition, linking both social and biophysical processes. We are using conceptual models, retrospective analysis and targeted knowledge collection, to build integration models (Bayesian networks) that sit within a decision support environment. Sensitivity assessment is being used to identify key causality pathways and to simplify complex models. The value of using Bayesian networks lies in their ability to integrate different forms of knowledge across disciplines, identify knowledge gaps and focus new data collection, incorporate the uncertainty inherent in large scale and long term environmental and social processes, and represent knowledge in a form that is useable by decision-makers. In this paper, we outline a process for linking investment to outcomes via a set of tools, and apply these tools to a case study. The focus of the case study is the Black Box (Eucalyptus largiflorens) depression vegetation communities, located on the NSW Murray floodplain. A set of tools were applied to determine the success of a wetland watering program, where a primary outcome was improving the maintenance and regeneration of trees.
dc.publisherModelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2009)
dc.source18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 Proceedings International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Cairns, Australia from 13–17 July 2009
dc.subjectKeywords: Adaptive learning; Biophysical process; Black boxes; Complex model; Conceptual model; Data collection; Decision makers; Decision supports; Environmental researches; Flood plains; Follow up; Integration models; Knowledge gaps; Natural resource management; Bayesian networks; Natural resource management; Sensitivity assessment
dc.titleTools for NRM: Linking investments to outcomes
dc.typeConference paper
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
dc.date.issued2009
local.identifier.absfor050205 - Environmental Management
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4474437xPUB37
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationPollino, Carmel, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLefroy, E.C., University of Tasmania
local.contributor.affiliationJakeman, Anthony , College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage2406
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2412
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:09:37Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-80053020525
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Pollino_Tools_for_NRM:_Linking_2009.pdf293.99 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator