Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Lower crustal rheological expression in inverted basins

Sandiford, Michael. A; Hansen, David; McLaren, Sandra

Description

Although lithospheric modelling has provided extraordinary insights into the processes that shape the continental crust, considerable uncertainty surrounds the basic rheology that governs behaviour at geological timescales. In part, this is because it has proved difficult to identify the geological observations that might discriminate, or unify, models of lithospheric rheology. In particular, the relative strength of lower crust and upper mantle remains a contentious aspect of continental...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorSandiford, Michael. A
dc.contributor.authorHansen, David
dc.contributor.authorMcLaren, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:41:29Z
dc.identifier.isbn0305871906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/24336
dc.description.abstractAlthough lithospheric modelling has provided extraordinary insights into the processes that shape the continental crust, considerable uncertainty surrounds the basic rheology that governs behaviour at geological timescales. In part, this is because it has proved difficult to identify the geological observations that might discriminate, or unify, models of lithospheric rheology. In particular, the relative strength of lower crust and upper mantle remains a contentious aspect of continental lithospheric rheology. We show that various models for lower crustal rheology may produce distinct patterns of inversion in extensional sedimentary basins, consistent with some of the observed natural variability of inversion styles. Inversion of basin interiors, as is common in European Mesozoic basins, is favoured by a lithospheric rheology more sensitive to lateral thermal structure than to changes in the depth of the Moho, consistent with there being little strength contrast between the lower crust and upper mantle in these settings. In contrast, inversion of basin margins, particularly involving basinward verging structures, is consistent with a rheological sensitivity to the depth of Moho as would apply for a lower crust much weaker than the upper mantle. We use an example from central Australia to demonstrate this latter response, together with thermochronologic data that suggests that a relatively weak lower crust in this setting may reflect abnormally high geothermal gradients.
dc.publisherGeological Society of London
dc.relation.ispartofAnalogue and Numerical Modelling of Crustal-Scale Processes
dc.relation.isversionof1 Edition
dc.subjectKeywords: continental crust; continental lithosphere; crustal evolution; inversion tectonics; lower crust; rheology; sedimentary basin; upper mantle
dc.titleLower crustal rheological expression in inverted basins
dc.typeBook chapter
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
dc.date.issued2006
local.identifier.absfor040399 - Geology not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absfor040313 - Tectonics
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9503261xPUB31
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationSandiford, Michael. A, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationHansen, David, University of Aarhus
local.contributor.affiliationMcLaren, Sandra, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage271
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage283
local.identifier.doi10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.253.01.14
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T11:01:32Z
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationLondon
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-33646402896
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Sandiford_Lower_crustal_rheological_2006.pdf500.29 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator