Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Withdrawing treatment at the direct or indirect request of patients or in their best interests: HNEAHS v A; Brightwater CG v Rossiter; and ACT v JT

Faunce, Thomas; Bai, J; Russell, Hilary


In Hunter and New England Area Health Service v A [2009] NSWSC 761; Brightwater Care Group (Inc) v Rossiter [2009] WASC 229; and Australian Capital Territory v JT [2009] ACTSC 105 Australian courts have recently considered the circumstances in which technically futile treatment may be withdrawn from patients at their direct or indirect request or purportedly in their best interests. The cases provide many valuable lessons about how norms of ethics, law and international human rights shape the...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2009
Type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Law and Medicine


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Faunce_Withdrawing_treatment_at_the_2009.pdf59.16 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  20 July 2017/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator