Comment on 'Low-lying 0+, T = 2 states of 12Be, 12C and 12O'
A description of the low-lying A = 12, 0+, T = 2 states from 30 years ago has recently been criticized and an alternative description proposed that is claimed to agree better with experimental data. We here discuss this claim and suggest a different interpretation of some of the data.
|Collections||ANU Research Publications|
|Source:||Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics|
|01_Barker_Comment_on_'Low-lying_0+,_T_=_2009.pdf||77.75 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|