Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems

de Chazal, Jacqui; Quetier, Fabien; Lavorel, Sandra; Van Doorn, Anne

Description

A method is proposed for assessing the vulnerability of socio-ecological systems that is explicitly linked to multiple stakeholder values enabling multiple assessments of vulnerability in the same or different locations. Three key features distinguish this method. Firstly, multiple ecosystem services are each identified and valued by multiple stakeholders. Secondly, a series of matrices are used to quantitatively and sequentially link social and ecological information from an initial,...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorde Chazal, Jacqui
dc.contributor.authorQuetier, Fabien
dc.contributor.authorLavorel, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorVan Doorn, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:25:02Z
dc.identifier.issn0959-3780
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/21085
dc.description.abstractA method is proposed for assessing the vulnerability of socio-ecological systems that is explicitly linked to multiple stakeholder values enabling multiple assessments of vulnerability in the same or different locations. Three key features distinguish this method. Firstly, multiple ecosystem services are each identified and valued by multiple stakeholders. Secondly, a series of matrices are used to quantitatively and sequentially link social and ecological information from an initial, scenario-based ecosystem change stimulus through to judgements about changes in ecosystem services. Thirdly, ecosystem properties that underlie the delivery of the ecosystem services are incorporated into the scenario projections. The framework is illustrated using data from two study sites in France and Portugal examining vulnerability of selected stakeholders to prospective land-use changes for 2030. Assessment results show stakeholders such as farmers and conservation agency groups (groups common to the two sites) or hunters in Portugal and hikers in France differ in their vulnerability to land-use change. Our explanation for this reflects our overall proposal that assessments of vulnerability are inescapably contextual and usually multiple, being mediated at the very least by the values and particular relationships that are assigned between people and their environment in a given location.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceGlobal Environmental Change: Part A - Human and Policy Dimensions
dc.subjectKeywords: ecosystem service; global change; land use change; socioeconomic conditions; stakeholder; vulnerability Ecosystem services; Global change scenarios; Land-use change; Plant functional traits; Stakeholder values; Traditional European agricultural landscapes; Vulnerability assessment
dc.titleIncluding multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume18
dc.date.issued2008
local.identifier.absfor050101 - Ecological Impacts of Climate Change
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4468094xPUB15
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationde Chazal, Jacqui, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationQuetier, Fabien, Universite Joseph Fourier
local.contributor.affiliationLavorel, Sandra, Universite Joseph Fourier
local.contributor.affiliationVan Doorn, Anne, Centrum Landschap
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage508
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage520
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T09:30:53Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-53349146472
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_de Chazal_Including_multiple_differing_2008.pdf601.39 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator