Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Receiver functions from seismic interferometry: a practical guide

Tauzin, Benoit; Pham, Thanh-Son; Tkalčić, Hrvoje

Description

This paper reviews the concepts underlying the well-documented receiver functions (RFs) method, and places it in the conceptual framework of seismic interferometry. We first propose a simple and efficient approach for isolating the receiver-side seismic response (i.e. the record of reflections and conversions in the stratification beneath receivers): this method makes use of the P-wave coda recorded on the radial and vertical components of three-component stations, applies spectral whitening,...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorTauzin, Benoit
dc.contributor.authorPham, Thanh-Son
dc.contributor.authorTkalčić, Hrvoje
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T10:17:32Z
dc.identifier.issn0956-540X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/203503
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews the concepts underlying the well-documented receiver functions (RFs) method, and places it in the conceptual framework of seismic interferometry. We first propose a simple and efficient approach for isolating the receiver-side seismic response (i.e. the record of reflections and conversions in the stratification beneath receivers): this method makes use of the P-wave coda recorded on the radial and vertical components of three-component stations, applies spectral whitening, which is followed by auto- and cross-correlation. The interferometric principle underpinning RFs analysis is shown theoretically and illustrated in practice using earthquake records and synthetic waveforms computed from simple structures. We point out to a major limitation, which is the contamination of the receiver-side response by propagation effects in the source-side structure. We then apply our approach to teleseismic earthquake data recorded in California. We show that the reconstructed vertical and horizontal seismic responses can be back-projected to illuminate the crustal and mantle structure. We build comparable ∼300-km-long seismic reflectivity profiles from pure P-wave reverberations and from the converted wavefield across the forearc and arc of the southern Cascadia subduction zone. Then, we show a case of processing data from narrow bandpass, short-period and single-component sensors, usually unsuitable for RFs analysis. Finally, through the same interferometric principle, we attempt to demonstrate a link between event- and noise-based seismic interferometry. We demonstrate that it is possible to extract approximate responses from the records of low-magnitude—down to 4.5—teleseismic earthquakes. We make a comparison of these estimates with the result from the autocorrelation of the continuous ambient noise seismic wavefield. While the amplitudes of the extracted receiver-side responses are mutually different, their phases are in a relative agreement. This development opens a way to the use of small magnitude teleseismic earthquakes to characterize the receiver-side structure.
dc.description.sponsorshipIRIS Data Services are funded through the Seismological Facilities for the Advancement of Geoscience and EarthScope (SAGE) Proposal of the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement EAR-1261681. We thank the universities of Oregon, California at Berkeley, Rice and the Earthscope program of the National Science Foundation for acquiring and providing the FAME waveform data. B.T. was funded by a Delegation CNRS and Conge pour Recherches et Conversion Thematique from the Universite de Lyon to visit the Research School of Earth Sciences (RSES), The Australian National University (ANU). We thank the CNRS, the Universite de Lyon, and ANU, for providing the funding and research environment.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s)
dc.sourceGeophysical Journal International
dc.titleReceiver functions from seismic interferometry: a practical guide
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume217
dc.date.issued2019
local.identifier.absfor040407 - Seismology and Seismic Exploration
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5786633xPUB705
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/journals
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationTauzin, Benoit, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationPham, Thanh Son, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTkalcic, Hrvoje, College of Science, ANU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage24
local.identifier.doi10.1093/gji/ggz002
local.identifier.absseo970104 - Expanding Knowledge in the Earth Sciences
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T08:02:42Z
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dc.provenancehttp://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0956-540X/..."Publisher's version/PDF on Institutional repositories or Central repositories, with all rights reserved" from Sherpa/Romeo (as at 1/05/2020) This article has been accepted for publication in [Geophysical Journal International] ©: The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Tauzin_Receiver_functions_from_2019.pdf16.55 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator