Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Reptiles and frogs use most land cover types as habitat in a fine-grained agricultural landscape

Pulsford, Stephanie; Barton, Philip; Driscoll, D.A.; Kay, Geoffrey; Lindenmayer, David B

Description

Agricultural landscapes comprise much of the earth's terrestrial surface. However, knowledge about how animals use and move through these landscapes is limited, especially for small and cryptic taxa, such as reptiles and amphibians. We aimed to understand the influence of land use on reptile and frog movement in a fine‐grained grazing landscape. We surveyed reptiles and frogs using pitfall and funnel traps in transects located in five land use types: 1) woodland remnants, 2) grazed pastures, 3)...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorPulsford, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Philip
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorKay, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T04:42:55Z
dc.identifier.issn1442-9985
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/197234
dc.description.abstractAgricultural landscapes comprise much of the earth's terrestrial surface. However, knowledge about how animals use and move through these landscapes is limited, especially for small and cryptic taxa, such as reptiles and amphibians. We aimed to understand the influence of land use on reptile and frog movement in a fine‐grained grazing landscape. We surveyed reptiles and frogs using pitfall and funnel traps in transects located in five land use types: 1) woodland remnants, 2) grazed pastures, 3) coarse woody debris added to grazed pastures, 4) fences in grazed pastures and 5) linear plantings within grazed pastures. We found that the different land cover types influenced the types and distances moved by different species and groups of species. Reptiles moved both within, and out of, grazed paddocks more than they did in woodland remnants. In contrast, frogs exhibited varying movement behaviours. The smooth toadlet (Uperoleia laevigata) moved more often and longer distances within remnants than within paddocks. The spotted marsh frog (Limnodynastes tasmaniensis) moved out of grazed pastures more than out of pastures with coarse woody debris added or fences and were never recaptured in plantings. We found that most recaptured reptiles and frogs (76.3%) did not move between trapping arrays, which added to evidence that they perceived most of the land cover types as habitat. We suggest that even simple fences may provide conduits for movement in the agricultural landscape for frogs. Otherwise, most reptile and frog species used all land cover types as habitat, though of varying quality. Reptiles appeared to perceive the woodland remnants as the highest quality habitat. This landscape is fine‐grained which may facilitate movement and persistence due to high heterogeneity in vegetation cover over short distances. Therefore, intensification and increasing the size of human land use may have negative impacts on these taxa.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the Environmental Trust (NSW) and the Lesslie Endowment for funding this research. Animal ethics protocol for this project was approved by the Australian National University Animal Care and Ethics Committee (protocol A2013/31). S. Pulsford was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2018 Ecological Society of Australia
dc.sourceAustral Ecology
dc.titleReptiles and frogs use most land cover types as habitat in a fine-grained agricultural landscape
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume43
dc.date.issued2018
local.identifier.absfor050211 - Wildlife and Habitat Management
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversity
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB10284
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gb
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationPulsford, Stephanie, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBarton, Philip, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationDriscoll, D.A., Deakin University
local.contributor.affiliationKay, Geoffrey, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David, College of Science, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage502
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage513
local.identifier.doi10.1111/aec.12587
local.identifier.absseo960804 - Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T07:20:15Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85042603925
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Pulsford_Reptiles_and_frogs_use_most_2018.pdf560.48 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator