Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Choice of Law in Federal Jurisdiction after Rizeq v Western Australia

Stellios, James

Description

This article considers the impact of the High Court’s decision in Rizeq v Western Australia on choice of law in federal jurisdiction. Section 79(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), along with s 80 of that Act, have been seen as central to choice of law when a court exercises federal jurisdiction. The High Court’s decision in Rizeq has reconceptualised the operation of s 79(1) and, while Rizeq was not a choice of law case, the High Court’s decision undoubtedly has choice of law implications.

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2018-09
Type: Journal article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/196888
Source: Australian Bar Review
Access Rights: Open Access after embargo

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Choice of law in federal jurisdiction after Rizeq v Western Australia — (2018) 46 Aust Bar Rev 187.pdf114.96 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator