Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Risk management from a legal and governance perspective

Eburn, Michael; Dovers, Stephen

Description

Risk management is seen as the key to living with potentially catastrophic hazards, but the language of disaster risk management carries with it the implication that all risks can in fact be managed. This implies that if there is an adverse outcome, even accepting an inherent residual risk, there must have been a failure by those responsible. The concept of risk management raises the further risk of being blamed for failing to meet community expectations and that risk, too, needs to be managed....[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorEburn, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDovers, Stephen
dc.coverage.spatialNewcastle Australia
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:20:36Z
dc.date.createdSeptember 4-6 2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/19666
dc.description.abstractRisk management is seen as the key to living with potentially catastrophic hazards, but the language of disaster risk management carries with it the implication that all risks can in fact be managed. This implies that if there is an adverse outcome, even accepting an inherent residual risk, there must have been a failure by those responsible. The concept of risk management raises the further risk of being blamed for failing to meet community expectations and that risk, too, needs to be managed. Power says: � experts who are being made increasingly accountable for what they do are now becoming more preoccupied with managing their own risks. Specifically, secondary risks to their reputation are becoming as significant as the primary risks for which experts have knowledge and training. (Power, M., The Risk Management of Everything (Demos, London 2004) 14). The ultimate expression of the secondary risk came with the conviction of six Italian scientists for manslaughter, over their failure to issue appropriate warnings regarding the risk of the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. This paper looks at the question of risk management from a legal and governance perspective. Drawing on developments in law and policy from Australia and around the world, this paper will explore whether disaster risk management is moving from reducing the risk to communities to reducing the risk to governments and emergency managers. Legal and policy reforms that may help to refocus disaster risk management to those vulnerable to hazards, rather than vulnerable to blame, will be identified.
dc.publisherInternational Society for Integrated Disaster Risk Management
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDealing with disaster
dc.source.urihttp://idrim.org/?page_id=315
dc.titleRisk management from a legal and governance perspective
dc.typeConference paper
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
dc.date.issued2013
local.identifier.absfor189999 - Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4203042xPUB9
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationEburn, Michael, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationDovers, Stephen, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage18
local.identifier.absseo949999 - Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T08:47:55Z
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Eburn_Risk_management_from_a_legal_2013.pdf655.76 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
02_Eburn_Risk_management_from_a_legal_2013.pdf590.54 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator