Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries

Banks, Emily; Meirik, Olav; Farley, Tim; Akande , O; Bathija, Heli; Ali, Mohamed; Fahmy, Amel

Description

Background: Reliable evidence about the effect of female genital mutilation (FGM) on obstetric outcome is scarce. This study examines the effect of different types of FGM on obstetric outcome. Methods: 28 393 women attending for singleton delivery between November, 2001, and March, 2003, at 28 obstetric centres in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sudan were examined before delivery to ascertain whether or not they had undergone FGM, and were classified according to the WHO...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.contributor.authorMeirik, Olav
dc.contributor.authorFarley, Tim
dc.contributor.authorAkande , O
dc.contributor.authorBathija, Heli
dc.contributor.authorAli, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorFahmy, Amel
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:20:31Z
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/19639
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reliable evidence about the effect of female genital mutilation (FGM) on obstetric outcome is scarce. This study examines the effect of different types of FGM on obstetric outcome. Methods: 28 393 women attending for singleton delivery between November, 2001, and March, 2003, at 28 obstetric centres in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sudan were examined before delivery to ascertain whether or not they had undergone FGM, and were classified according to the WHO system: FGM I, removal of the prepuce or clitoris, or both; FGM II, removal of clitoris and labia minora; and FGM III, removal of part or all of the external genitalia with stitching or narrowing of the vaginal opening. Prospective information on demographic, health, and reproductive factors was gathered. Participants and their infants were followed up until maternal discharge from hospital. Findings: Compared with women without FGM, the adjusted relative risks of certain obstetric complications were, in women with FGM I, II, and III, respectively: caesarean section 1·03 (95% CI 0·88-1·21), 1·29 (1·09-1·52), 1·31 (1·01-1·70); postpartum haemorrhage 1·03 (0·87-1·21), 1·21 (1·01-1·43), 1·69 (1·34-2·12); extended maternal hospital stay 1·15 (0·97-1·35), 1·51 (1·29-1·76), 1·98 (1·54-2·54); infant resuscitation 1·11 (0·95-1·28), 1·28 (1·10-1·49), 1·66 (1·31-2·10), stillbirth or early neonatal death 1·15 (0·94-1·41), 1·32 (1·08-1·62), 1·55 (1·12-2·16), and low birthweight 0·94 (0·82-1·07), 1·03 (0·89-1·18), 0·91 (0·74-1·11). Parity did not significantly affect these relative risks. FGM is estimated to lead to an extra one to two perinatal deaths per 100 deliveries. Interpretation: Women with FGM are significantly more likely than those without FGM to have adverse obstetric outcomes. Risks seem to be greater with more extensive FGM.
dc.publisherLancet Publishing Group
dc.sourceLancet, The (UK edition)
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; article; birth weight; Burkina Faso; cesarean section; childbirth; clitoris; confidence interval; controlled study; demography; female; female genital mutilation; female genital system; follow up; genital system; Ghana; hospital discharge; hospital
dc.titleFemale genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume367
dc.date.issued2006
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4054856xPUB9
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMeirik, Olav, Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva
local.contributor.affiliationFarley, Tim, WHO
local.contributor.affiliationAkande , O, WHO
local.contributor.affiliationBathija, Heli, WHO
local.contributor.affiliationAli, Mohamed, WHO
local.contributor.affiliationFahmy, Amel, WHO
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1835
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1841
local.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T08:47:11Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-33744542579
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Banks_Female_genital_mutilation_and_2006.pdf102.97 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator