Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Moral error theories and folk metaethics

Fraser, Benjamin


In this paper, I distinguish between two error theories of morality: one couched in terms of truth (ET1); the other in terms of justification (ET2). I then present two arguments: the Poisoned Presupposition Argument for ET1; and the Evolutionary Debunking Argument for ET2. I go on to show how assessing these arguments requires paying attention to empirical moral psychology, in particular, work on folk metaethics. After criticizing extant work, I suggest avenues for future research.

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2014
Type: Journal article
Source: Philosophical Psychology
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2013.769144


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Fraser_Moral_error_theories_and_folk_2014.pdf133.78 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
02_Fraser_Moral_error_theories_and_folk_2014.pdf157.56 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  20 July 2017/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator