Skip navigation
Skip navigation

In‐gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score

Jyoti, Rajeev; Jina, N; Haxhimolla, Hodo

Description

Introduction The recent literature has focussed predominantly on prostate cancer detection which has been revolutionized by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Due to an overlap of features, prostatitis may mimic prostate cancer on MRI, especially in patients with chronic prostatitis. We retrospectively analysed our in‐gantry MRI‐guided biopsy (MRGB) results to determine incidental detection rate of prostatitis in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3, 4 and 5...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorJyoti, Rajeev
dc.contributor.authorJina, N
dc.contributor.authorHaxhimolla, Hodo
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T06:29:54Z
dc.identifier.issn1754-9477
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/164892
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The recent literature has focussed predominantly on prostate cancer detection which has been revolutionized by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Due to an overlap of features, prostatitis may mimic prostate cancer on MRI, especially in patients with chronic prostatitis. We retrospectively analysed our in‐gantry MRI‐guided biopsy (MRGB) results to determine incidental detection rate of prostatitis in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3, 4 and 5 foci reported on diagnostic MRI of the prostate. Methods About 137 patients underwent in‐gantry MRGB for lesions with PIRADS score of 3 or above. All the biopsies were performed utilizing the dynaTRIM™ system (Invio Inc, Germany) on a three‐tesla MRI scanner (Ingenia 3.0T, Philips, Netherlands) by a Radiologist and a Urologist. Results We biopsied 228 lesions in 137 patients. There were 55 lesions that returned positive for prostate cancer with a Gleason Score of 3 + 3 = 6 or above. There were 62 lesions that showed inflammation. The distribution of these lesions was 3 (5%) in the central zone, 32 (52%) in the transitional zone and 27 (43%) in the peripheral zone. Inflammation was found in 36 (58%) PIRADS 3 lesions, 24 (39%) PIRADS 4 lesions and 2 (3%) PIRADS 5 lesions on pre biopsy MRI evaluation. Conclusion In our series, biopsies which showed inflammation had a radiological appearance on mpMRI more likely of a PIRADS 3 or 4 lesions with only 3% of PIRADS 5 biopsies showing inflammation. This would suggest that a higher PIRADS score can more reliably differentiate between prostate cancer and prostatitis.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
dc.sourceJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
dc.titleIn‐gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume61
dc.date.issued2017
local.identifier.absfor110399 - Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5369653xPUB15
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gb
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationJyoti, Rajeev, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationJina, N, The Canberra Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationHaxhimolla, Hodo, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage212
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage215
local.identifier.doi10.1111/1754-9485.12555
local.identifier.absseo920499 - Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
dc.date.updated2019-03-31T07:24:16Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85017278708
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Jyoti_In%E2%80%90gantry_MRI_guided_prostate_2017.pdf347.68 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator