Hansen, Nicole
Description
Preventing biodiversity loss in fragmented agricultural
landscapes is a global problem that requires knowledge of how
species move through landscapes. Farming practices can increase
the contrast between remnant patches of native vegetation and
adjoining habitats, with negative consequences for species
movement and the preservation of biodiversity. Yet, the
relationships between habitat attributes and the presence of
species are poorly understood, and the...[Show more] mechanisms influencing
cross-habitat movement has rarely been empirically tested,
particularly for less mobile organisms such as frogs, snakes and
lizards (herpetofauna).
To address this important knowledge gap, I used a large-scale,
empirical experiment to examine herpetofauna abundance, species
richness, body condition, risk of predation, and inter-habitat
movement between remnant woodland patches, edges and four
contrasting farm land use types: 1) crop fields, 2) pasture
paddocks, 3) linear plantings, and 4) woody mulch applied to a
crop paddock after harvest. I also examined the effect of crop
harvesting and seasonal effects on the distribution and abundance
of herpetofauna.
In the second and third chapters of the thesis, I compared the
habitat preferences and abundance and, richness and body
condition (frogs only) of reptiles and frogs to predictions
developed from a conceptual matrix model and literature review. I
found the structure and quality of the matrix was a stronger
influence on reptile abundance, species richness and movement
than the temporal effect of crop harvesting (chapter 2). My
results demonstrate remnant patches and farmland, particularly
those with woody vegetation plantings, can provide suitable
habitat for common reptile species, but this environment is not
readily interchangeable as habitat for uncommon reptile species.
The negative response of uncommon reptile abundance and species
richness to farmland, irrespective of restoration, indicate that
farmland not only reduced their abundance but also the likelihood
of presence. I also observed a negative trend in uncommon reptile
abundance in remnant patches adjacent to crop paddocks. These
findings suggest that crop paddocks and associated farming
activities may be negatively influencing animals within both
patches and matrix, further isolating populations, and
reinforcing the negative consequences of conversion to
agriculture for reptile populations.
In Chapter three, my study revealed while frog abundance was
positively associated with woody vegetation plantings within
farmland, many frog species were found ubiquitously throughout
the landscape, reflecting the dominance of a few disturbance
tolerant species in the amphibian assemblage. My movement data
demonstrated that frogs used multiple farmland types, moved
between remnant patches and farmland, and into and out of cropped
paddocks across harvesting periods. Unexpectedly, I found crop
harvesting did not reduce frog abundance in crop paddocks, with
some individuals persisting in farmland after harvesting. Body
condition analyses indicated that farmland areas may provide good
quality habitat for frogs and allow movement, dispersal, and
foraging opportunities. My findings provide important insights
into the utilisation of highly modified farmland as terrestrial
habitat for frogs. This new knowledge is valuable in the context
of land use intensification, and global amphibian declines. While
much effort has focused on the protection of aquatic habitats for
amphibians, management strategies must also consider the range of
contrasting farmland types present in cropping areas, and the
habitat requirements of the target species.
In the fourth chapter, I explored how contrasting habitats and
farm management influences predation risk in lizards using
wildlife cameras and plasticine replica lizard models. I found
predation pressure from multiple predators, operating across the
landscape, could be compounding the effects of habitat
degradation and fragmentation. Predation attempts on models were
highest at habitat edges, with a reduced risk within farmland and
remnant patches. My findings suggest edge habitats are
‘risker’ for lizards than farmland, and may act as a
population sink, preventing reptiles from moving into the
farmland if individuals suffer increased mortality at the edge.
Such trends have not been previously reported for cropped
landscapes.
Finally, in the fifth chapter, I examined detailed movement
patterns and behavior of a patch-dependent gecko species, Eastern
Tree Dtella Gehyra versicolor, using radio-telemetry, fluorescent
powder and an experiment displacement to examine movement and
avoidance behaviour in response to different woodland to farmland
edges. Unexpectedly, I found edge effects with a strong
partitioning of individuals away from farmland, irrespective of
the presence of complex habitat (e.g. linear plantings), in
preference for remnant patches. We found pasture environments
promoted direct movements of displaced geckos at a set distance
from remnant patches into pastures. However, none of the
radio-tracked geckos crossed the woodland-pasture edge,
suggesting pastures may reduce homing ability of geckos. These
findings contrast with the known ecology of the species and
suggest, despite efforts to improve farmland quality by planting,
farmland is not a preferred habitat for this species and does not
promote longer distance dispersal movements.
By examining the influence of anthropogenic habitat change on
herpetofauna it is possible to improve our understanding of the
distribution of species outside of remnant native vegetation. My
research findings provide new insights into the complex responses
of herpetofauna to contrasting farmland uses in cropping
landscapes. I provide evidence for potential drivers to explain
herpetofauna distribution within highly disturbed areas.
Importantly, I have demonstrated the relative value of different
farmland types for facilitating and reducing movement and
providing habitat across diverse agricultural landscapes. Through
my series of inter-connected studies, I highlight important
opportunities to promote herpetofauna conservation in
agricultural landscapes by protecting remnant native vegetation
and by increasing restoration efforts in cropping landscapes by
establishing linear plantings. I also identify management
practices to reduce mortality risk in areas where dispersal may
be important by focusing on implementing strategies that increase
shelter opportunities for lizards and to reduce the size of edges
particularly where dispersal may be important (such as between
remnants and linear plantings). This new knowledge is valuable in
the context of promoting landscape connectivity, targeted
restoration programs, and arresting global herpetofauna decline.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.