Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Patient beliefs and attitudes to taking statins: systematic review of qualitative studies

Ju, Angela; Hanson, Camilla S.; Banks, Emily; Korda, Rosemary; Craig, Jonathan; Tim, Usherwood; MacDonald, Peter S; Tong, Allison

Description

Background Statins are effective in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and are recommended for at-risk individuals but estimated adherence rates are low. Aim To describe patients’ perspectives, experiences, and attitudes towards taking statins. Design and setting Systematic review of qualitative studies reporting perspectives of patients on statins. Method PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PhD dissertations from inception to 6 October 2016 were searched for qualitative...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorJu, Angela
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Camilla S.
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.contributor.authorKorda, Rosemary
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorTim, Usherwood
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Peter S
dc.contributor.authorTong, Allison
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-06T01:14:25Z
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/163975
dc.description.abstractBackground Statins are effective in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and are recommended for at-risk individuals but estimated adherence rates are low. Aim To describe patients’ perspectives, experiences, and attitudes towards taking statins. Design and setting Systematic review of qualitative studies reporting perspectives of patients on statins. Method PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PhD dissertations from inception to 6 October 2016 were searched for qualitative studies on adult patients’ perspectives on statins. All text and participant quotations were extracted from each article and analysed by thematic synthesis. Results Thirty-two studies involving 888 participants aged 22–93 years across eight countries were included. Seven themes were identified: confidence in prevention (trust in efficacy, minimising long-term catastrophic CVD, taking control, easing anxiety about high cholesterol); routinising into daily life; questioning utility (imperceptible benefits, uncertainties about pharmacological mechanisms); medical distrust (scepticism about overprescribing, pressure to start therapy); threatening health (competing priorities and risks, debilitating side effects, toxicity to body); signifying sickness (fear of perpetual dependence, losing the battle); and financial strain. Conclusion An expectation that statins could prevent CVD and being able to integrate the statin regimen in daily life facilitated acceptance of statins among patients. However, avoiding the ‘sick’ identity and prolonged dependence on medications, uncertainties about the pharmacological mechanisms, risks to health, side effects, costs, and scepticism about clinicians’ motives for prescribing statins were barriers to uptake. Shared decision making that addresses the risks, reasons for prescribing, patient priorities, and implementing strategies to minimise lifestyle intrusion and manage side effects may improve patient satisfaction and continuation of statins.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Partnership Grant (NHMRC) (1092674), including support from the National Heart Foundation of Australia, and an NHMRC Program Grant (1092597). Allison Tong and Emily Banks are supported by NHMRC Fellowships (1106716 and 1042717, respectively).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitioners
dc.rights© British Journal of General Practice
dc.sourceBritish Journal of General Practice
dc.titlePatient beliefs and attitudes to taking statins: systematic review of qualitative studies
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume68
dc.date.issued2018
local.identifier.absfor110201 - Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB10143
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.rcgp.org.uk/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationJu, Angela, Sydney School of Public Health
local.contributor.affiliationHanson, Camilla S. , Sydney School of Public Health
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationKorda, Rosemary, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationCraig, Jonathan, University of Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationTim, Usherwood, Sydney Medical School
local.contributor.affiliationMacDonald , Peter S , St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationTong , Allison, The University of Sydney
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1092674
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1106716
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1042717
local.bibliographicCitation.issue671
local.bibliographicCitation.startpagee408
local.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp18X696365
local.identifier.absseo920203 - Diagnostic Methods
dc.date.updated2023-01-15T07:16:24Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85048210404
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000442323400004
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Ju_Patient_beliefs_and_attitudes_2018.pdf151.83 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator