Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Climate Change and State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations: Causation and Imputation

Quirico, Ottavio

Description

The Paris Agreement provides that States should respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights' in taking action to address climate change'. Should therefore States be held responsible for anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in breach of fundamental obligations, that is, the duties to respect, protect and fulfil first, second and third generation human rights? The key cases of the Inuit Petitions to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and Kivalina...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorQuirico, Ottavio
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T00:18:31Z
dc.identifier.issn0165-070X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/163733
dc.description.abstractThe Paris Agreement provides that States should respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights' in taking action to address climate change'. Should therefore States be held responsible for anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in breach of fundamental obligations, that is, the duties to respect, protect and fulfil first, second and third generation human rights? The key cases of the Inuit Petitions to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and Kivalina demonstrate that there are serious objective and subjective impediments to holding a State responsible for greenhouse gas emissions. By contrast, the decision of the Hague District Court in Urgenda has the potential to prompt a paradigm shift, whereby the evolution from first to second and third generation human rights allows streamlining fundamental issues of causation, extraterritoriality, attribution of responsibility and policy discretion. It is therefore arguable that the international recognition of a human right to a sustainable environment would require the plaintiff to only demonstrate direct causation, instead of indirect causation, thus fundamentally shifting the burden of proof to the defendant. Furthermore, such a right would allow attributing responsibility pro rata, based on minimum reduction targets outlined in the UNFCCC regime, overcoming issues of extraterritoriality and policy discretion. The human right to a sustainable environment entails asserting the fundamental nature of the no-harm rule.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherT.M.C Asser Press
dc.rights© T.M.C. Asser Press 2018
dc.sourceNetherlands International Law Review
dc.titleClimate Change and State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations: Causation and Imputation
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume65
dc.date.issued2018
local.identifier.absfor160607 - International Relations
local.identifier.absfor160699 - Political Science not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB1845
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/journal/40802
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationQuirico, Ottavio, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage185
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage215
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s40802-018-0110-0
dc.date.updated2019-03-17T07:16:53Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85053669377
local.identifier.thomsonID000445203400004
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Quirico_Climate_Change_and_State_2018.pdf999.57 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator