Religious freedom and the principles of subsidiarity and margin of appreciation: the jurisdictional responsibilities and interrelationships of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.
The European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union have distinct as well as inter-related jurisdictions. This important feature of the courts is addressed in this paper with reference to cases involving judgments on religious freedom within the bounds of the principles of subsidiarity and margin of appreciation. The courts have been guided by these principles, as well as contributing to their development, in considering matters of religious freedom under EU laws...[Show more]
|Collections||ANU Centre for European Studies (ANUCES)|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.