Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Typological Differences in Morphological Patterns, Gender Features, and Thematic Structure in the L2 Acquisition of Ashaninka Spanish

Sanchez, Liliana; Mayer, Elisabeth

Description

It has been widely argued that morphological competence, particularly functional morphology, represents the bottleneck of second language acquisition (Jensen et al. 2017; Lardiere 1998, 2005; Slabakova 2008, 2009, 2013). In this study, we explore three challenging aspects of the morphology of Spanish among advanced L1 Ashaninka—L2 Spanish speakers: (i) the acquisition of proclitics and enclitics with inflected verbs; (ii) the distribution of accusative clitics according to the thematic role of...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Liliana
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T00:10:57Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T00:10:57Z
dc.identifier.issn2226-471X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/157121
dc.description.abstractIt has been widely argued that morphological competence, particularly functional morphology, represents the bottleneck of second language acquisition (Jensen et al. 2017; Lardiere 1998, 2005; Slabakova 2008, 2009, 2013). In this study, we explore three challenging aspects of the morphology of Spanish among advanced L1 Ashaninka—L2 Spanish speakers: (i) the acquisition of proclitics and enclitics with inflected verbs; (ii) the distribution of accusative clitics according to the thematic role of the direct object in anaphoric and doubling structures; and (iii) the distribution of clitic forms and their association with gender features. Our results show evidence of the L2 acquisition of clitic structures in L2 Spanish speakers, and no difference between native and L2 speakers regarding sensitivity to thematic roles. However, there are statistically significant differences between groups in the distribution of the gender specification of the clitic antecedents or doubled determiner phrases (DPs). We take these results as evidence in support of the view that morphological patterns can be acquired (proclitics vs. suffixes) as well as preferences for mapping thematic roles onto clitics, but subtle differences in the continuum of preferences for mapping gender features are more difficult to acquire.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.sourceLanguages
dc.titleTypological Differences in Morphological Patterns, Gender Features, and Thematic Structure in the L2 Acquisition of Ashaninka Spanish
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume3
dc.date.issued2018
local.identifier.absfor200308 - Iberian Languages
local.identifier.absfor200408 - Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9803255xPUB2180
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationSanchez, Liliana, The State University of New Jersey
local.contributor.affiliationMayer, Elisabeth, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue21
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage24
local.identifier.doi10.3390/languages3020021
local.identifier.absseo950202 - Languages and Literacy
dc.date.updated2019-03-12T07:44:29Z
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Sanchez_Typological_Differences_in_2018.pdf3.73 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator