Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?

Chuard, Pierre J. C.; Vrtílek, Milan; Head, Megan; Jennions, Michael D.

Description

There is increased concern about poor scientific practices arising from an excessive focus on P-values. Two particularly worrisome practices are selective reporting of significant results and ‘P-hacking’. The latter is the manipulation of data collection, usage, or analyses to obtain statistically significant outcomes. Here, we introduce the novel, to our knowledge, concepts of selective reporting of nonsignificant results and ‘reverse P-hacking’ whereby researchers ensure that tests produce a...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2019-01-25
Type: Journal article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/156427
Source: PLOS Biology
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
Access Rights: Open Access

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01 Chuard P J C et al Evidence that nonsignificant 2019.pdf547.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator