Pareto improvement through unilateral matching of public good contributions: The role of commitment
When providing public goods through voluntary contributions, a donor may introduce unilateral matching in order to reduce underprovision of the public good and thus inefficiency. By itself, however, matching benefits the donor but harms the recipient. We apply Cornes and Hartley’s aggregative game approach to provide a novel graphical explanation of this transfer paradox, and also show how it may be avoided by introducing a commitment device.
|Collections||ANU Research Publications|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.