Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Are "part-time" general practitioners workforce idlers or committed professionals?

Dwan, Kathryn M.; Douglas, Kirsty A.; Forrest, Laura E.

Description

BACKGROUND: The traditional view of general practice holds that only general practitioners (GPs) in full-time clinical practice can provide quality patient care. Nevertheless, increasing numbers of GPs are choosing to work sessionally, that is, ostensibly “part-time”. There are concerns about the health workforce’s ability to meet demand and also fears that patient care may be compromised. We sought answers to a) what activities do GPs undertake when not consulting patients, b) why do they...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorDwan, Kathryn M.
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Kirsty A.
dc.contributor.authorForrest, Laura E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-03T01:32:16Z
dc.date.available2015-09-03T01:32:16Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-154
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/15122
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The traditional view of general practice holds that only general practitioners (GPs) in full-time clinical practice can provide quality patient care. Nevertheless, increasing numbers of GPs are choosing to work sessionally, that is, ostensibly “part-time”. There are concerns about the health workforce’s ability to meet demand and also fears that patient care may be compromised. We sought answers to a) what activities do GPs undertake when not consulting patients, b) why do they choose to work sessionally, and c) does sessional general practice reflect a lack of commitment to patients and the profession? METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs who worked sessionally, (i.e. six or fewer sessions a week in clinical general practice, where a session comprises four consecutive hours of patient care). These data were analysed qualitatively and saturation was reached. RESULTS: The majority of participants were in full-time paid employment, while part-time in clinical general practice. They reported that consultations increasingly required the management of patients with complex, chronic conditions who also required psychological management. Coupled with unrealistic patient expectations, these factors led GPs to be concerned about maintaining the quality patient care they considered professionally desirable. Many diversified their work activities to ensure that they retained their professional standards. CONCLUSIONS: “Part-time” general practice is a misnomer that masks the contribution these GPs make as part of the health workforce. Sessional practice more accurately describes the nature of our participants’ clinical work. Their choice of sessional work is a professional response to the increasing demands within the consultation. It enables GPs to maintain their commitment to quality patient care and their profession, while attenuating the challenges of demanding consultations. Sessional general practitioners demonstrate strong commitment to their patients and the profession.
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rights© 2014 Dwan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
dc.sourceBMC Family Practice
dc.titleAre "part-time" general practitioners workforce idlers or committed professionals?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderDwan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
local.identifier.citationvolume15
dc.date.issued2014-09-19
local.identifier.absfor111700 - PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES
local.identifier.ariespublicationU3488905xPUB4966
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationDwan, K. M., Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, The Australian National University
local.contributor.affiliationDouglas, K. A., Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, The Australian National University
local.identifier.essn1471-2296
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage154
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage7
local.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-15-154
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:06:50Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84910674049
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Dwan et al Are Part-time General Practitioners 2014.pdf264.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator