Lord Amherst's Embassy to the Jiaqing Emperor, 1816
-
Altmetric Citations
Description
The Amherst Embassy to the Qing court in 1816 remains little researched in comparison with the earlier Macartney Embassy (1792-94). This dissertation offers the first comprehensive account of the Embassy and reassesses its importance for Anglo-Chinese relations in the period before the First Opium War of 1839-42. It addresses why the British thought the Amherst Embassy would succeed where the Macartney Embassy had failed and how the latter’s legacy led the British to misjudge the response of...[Show more]
dc.contributor.author | Stevenson, Caroline Moira | |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-07T06:34:35Z | |
dc.identifier.other | b49661747 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/143193 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Amherst Embassy to the Qing court in 1816 remains little researched in comparison with the earlier Macartney Embassy (1792-94). This dissertation offers the first comprehensive account of the Embassy and reassesses its importance for Anglo-Chinese relations in the period before the First Opium War of 1839-42. It addresses why the British thought the Amherst Embassy would succeed where the Macartney Embassy had failed and how the latter’s legacy led the British to misjudge the response of the Jiaqing court. Largely ignored primary sources, in addition to the East India Company records, have provided important new insights into British motivations for dispatching the Embassy and for assessing Amherst’s role as the leader of the mission. The popular view that Amherst was indecisive and overly influenced by the Second Commissioner, George Staunton, in refusing to kotow before the Jiaqing emperor thereby consigning the Embassy to its premature dismissal, is rejected. Amherst emerges as an effective leader whose options were constrained by earlier flawed assumptions about British standing in China, ambiguous and conflicting instructions and an uncompromising Qing court determined to reinforce the protocols of the tributary system. The intense diplomatic encounter endured by the Amherst Embassy is examined within a traditional historical approach of causes, responses and outcomes although aspects of the resulting cultural clash lend themselves to an anthropological and sensory analysis. A revised British assessment of China arose from the diplomatic ashes of the Embassy’s failure. Views of the Qing emperor changed from a civil and enlightened despot to a degenerate potentate ruling over a decaying empire whose arrogance and ignorance rendered futile any further British diplomatic overtures. It was already apparent to some officials that force might be required in future to achieve British aims in China. | |
dc.format.extent | 1 vol. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | |
dc.publisher | Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University | |
dc.rights | Author retains copyright | |
dc.subject | Amherst Embassy | |
dc.subject | Macartney Embassy | |
dc.subject | William Pitt Amherst | |
dc.subject | George Thomas Staunton | |
dc.subject | Henry Ellis | |
dc.subject | Anglo-Chinese Diplomatic relations | |
dc.subject | Kowtow | |
dc.subject | Jiaqing Emperor | |
dc.subject | British cultural relations with China | |
dc.subject | John Barrow | |
dc.subject | Canton trade | |
dc.subject | HMS Alceste | |
dc.subject | Captain Basil Hall | |
dc.subject | Rev. Dr Robert Morrison | |
dc.title | Lord Amherst's Embassy to the Jiaqing Emperor, 1816 | |
dc.type | Thesis (PhD) | |
local.contributor.institution | The Australian National University | |
local.contributor.supervisor | Penny, Benjamin | |
local.contributor.supervisorcontact | Benjamin.Penny@anu.edu.au | |
dcterms.valid | 2018 | |
local.description.notes | the author deposited 7/05/2018 | |
local.description.refereed | Yes | |
local.type.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
local.type.status | Accepted Version | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Australian Centre on China in the World, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University | |
local.request.name | Digital Theses | |
local.identifier.doi | 10.25911/5d514428d84b2 | |
dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
dc.provenance | 16.6.2021 Made thesis open access as author gave permission for thesis to become open access as of 28/05/2021 [ERMS6340169] | |
local.mintdoi | mint | |
Collections | Open Access Theses |
Download
File | Description | Size | Format | Image |
---|---|---|---|---|
PhD Dissertation Revised 15 Nov 2018 Caroline Stevenson - 2018.pdf | 3.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Updated: 17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer: University Librarian/ Page Contact: Library Systems & Web Coordinator