Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Comparison between Secondary Electron Microscopy Dopant Contrast Image (SEMDCI) and Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC) for laser doping of crystalline silicon

Xu, Lujia; Hameiri, Ziv; Weber, Klaus; Yang, Xinbo

Description

Laser doping of crystalline silicon has been the subject of intense research over the past decade, due to its potential to enable the fabrication of high efficiency and low-cost crystalline silicon solar cells. Information regarding the doping profile created by the process is critical for process optimisation, however is generally difficult to obtain. In this paper, a relatively new technique for characterising laser doping cross-sections — Secondary Electron Microscopy Dopant Contrast...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorXu, Lujia
dc.contributor.authorHameiri, Ziv
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorYang, Xinbo
dc.coverage.spatials-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-27T03:01:48Z
dc.date.available2015-05-27T03:01:48Z
dc.date.createdMarch 25-27 2014
dc.identifier.isbn18766102
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/13603
dc.description.abstractLaser doping of crystalline silicon has been the subject of intense research over the past decade, due to its potential to enable the fabrication of high efficiency and low-cost crystalline silicon solar cells. Information regarding the doping profile created by the process is critical for process optimisation, however is generally difficult to obtain. In this paper, a relatively new technique for characterising laser doping cross-sections — Secondary Electron Microscopy Dopant Contrast Image (SEMDCI) — is compared with the widely used Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC) method. A good agreement between the two techniques regarding the p-n junction profile is demonstrated. The differences between the methods are attributed to the difference of the sensitivity. The comparison demonstrates the reliability and usefulness of the SEMDCI as a characterisation method for laser doping, which shows both the p-n junction outline and dopant distribution within the doped regions. The differences between the methods and the challenges associated with the application of the SEMDCI method are also discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is partially supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Clean Energy Research Program Programme (CERP Award No. NRF2010EWT-CERP001-022).
dc.format7 pages
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseries4th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2014
dc.rights© 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
dc.sourceEnergy Procedia
dc.subjectSEMDCI
dc.subjectEBIC
dc.subjectlaser doping
dc.titleComparison between Secondary Electron Microscopy Dopant Contrast Image (SEMDCI) and Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC) for laser doping of crystalline silicon
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesThis paper was presented at the 4th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2014; Hertogenbosch; Netherlands; 25 March 2014 through 27 March 2014.
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.citationvolume55
dc.date.issued2014
local.identifier.absfor090605 - Photodetectors, Optical Sensors and Solar Cells
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB1074
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.elsevier.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationXu, Lujia, Research School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University
local.contributor.affiliationWeber, Klaus, Research School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University
local.contributor.affiliationYang, Xinbo, Research School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage179
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage185
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.112
local.identifier.absseo850504 - Solar-Photovoltaic Energy
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T09:57:01Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84922288241
local.identifier.thomsonID000346095800024
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Xu, L et al Comparison between secondary 2014.pdf2.71 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator