Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Tools for grading evidence: strengths, weaknesses, and the impact on effective knowledge translation

CollectionsGlobal Conference on Research Integration and Implementation (2013)
Title: Tools for grading evidence: strengths, weaknesses, and the impact on effective knowledge translation
Author(s): Irving, Michelle
Cherbuin, Nic
Eramudugolla, Ranmalee
Butterworth, Peter
O'Donoughue Jenkins, Lily
Anstey, Kaarin
Keywords: evidence
knowledge translation
grading
grading instruments
Date published: 8-Sep-2013
Publisher: Australian National University
Citation: Irving, M., Cherbuin, N., Eramudugolla, R., Butterworth, P., O'Donoughue Jenkin, L., Anstey, K. (2013). Tools for grading evidence: strengths, weaknesses, and the impact on effective knowledge translation. Digital poster presented at the First Global Conference on Research Integration and Implementation
Description: 
Rating evidence and knowledge translation: Could grading tools be selling us short? Knowledge Translation is defined by the World Health Organization as “the synthesis, exchange, and application of knowledge by relevant stakeholders to accelerate the benefits of global and local innovation in strengthening health systems and improving people’s health” (WHO, 2005). This objective is compromised when a body of research is oversimplified, graded incorrectly, or not fully understood by those relying on flawed grading systems to inform their decision making.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/11135

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
IrvingetalToolsforgradingevidence2013.pdfPublished version196.92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  23 August 2018/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator