Nation, John Robert
Description
There is a need to consider critically the growing popularity of
projects as vehicles for development in the light of their frequent
failure to achieve their stated objectives. The central question
addressed by the study is: can projects funded by external aid donors
circumvent the economic, social and political problems that hinder
development within the national political framework of developing
countries? This involves an enquiry into the relationship between
bureaucratic authority...[Show more] and traditional society, a relationship which
is inherent in the project mode of development assistance. The
particular significance of Fiji as a case study lies in the fact that
it is a liberal democratic state which has retained a bureaucratic
civil service and is, therefore, apparently an ideal environment for
project implementation.
The thesis examines in depth two aid-funded cattle projects,
studying the contexts within which they were established and their
progress through the various stages of the project cycle. Both
projects were established with the explicit aim of expanding the
participation of indigenous Fijians in the commercial economy. One
(Uluisaivou) sought to achieve this goal through a communally owned
ranch; the other (Yalavou) created individually owned farms.
The comparison of the projects centres on the different ways in
which project planners (including managers) have sought to control the
direction of the projects while at the same time allowing for 'local
participation', which recent studies have argued is the key to
successful project outcome. Both projects made serious attempts to
provide for local participation though the attempts were not matched
by performance. At Uluisaivou a clear local majority on the
corporation board could not overcome the difficulties created by the fact that whole conception of such a large communally owned enterprise
run according to modern business principles was foreign to the local
populace. At Yalavou, by contrast, a preimplementation phase during
which landowners were able to make the project more fundamentally in
accord with their wishes removed many, though not all, problems of
participation, at least in the initial stages of the project.
Consideration of the problems experienced in both projects
suggests that the achievement of participation is the main problem
rather than the solution to other problems. Moreover, the inevitably
bureaucratic nature of the oversight of projects exercised by aid
donors means that the most assiduous, on-going attention must be given
to the various problems of participation; they are not susceptible to
any single, once-and-for-all solution. Bureaucracies, which are
attracted to 'final solutions' (such as replicable models for
development) are also attracted to neat dichotomies, despite the many
failures experienced as a result of the inability of dichotomies to
capture the untidy complications of social reality. The
communalism/individualism dichotomy, which characterized planning in
colonial Fiji for so long, illustrates clearly both the fruitlessness
and the inevitable attractions of dichotomies. In Western societies
such dichotomies can be broken down through interaction between
bureaucrats, political leaders and citizenry. In developing societies
such interaction is not easy to achieve. The important role
sociologists can play in project work is that of facilitating the
interactive political process through which the interests of project
participants can be articulated and incorporated into projects.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.