Roberts, Heather Jan
Description
Justice Deane was a member of the High Court from 1982 until 1995. This thesis
examines Deane's constitutional jurisprudence during this period and argues
that his decisions were permeated by themes and principles forming a coherent
vision of the Constitution and its interpretation. Although voiced most fully in
Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times (1994) 182 CLR 104, Deane's
constitutional vision was evident from his earliest High Court decisions.
Central to Deane's constitutional...[Show more] philosophy was his concept of 'the people'.
Deane regarded 'the people' as the source of legal authority of the Constitution,
and the Constitution as ultimately concerned with their governance and
protection. Although Deane recognised the importance of representative
democracy as a fundamental commitment of the Constitution, it was the Court,
and judicial process, that for Deane was the most important guarantee of
individual liberty. Consistent with this understanding of the role of the Court,
Deane's jurisprudence favoured rights-sensitive interpretations of the
Constitution's text, including the development of a number of innovative, and
controversial, implied constitutional rights. These features of Deane's
constitutional jurisprudence, matched with his reliance on broad and flexible
interpretive principles in constitutional interpretation, challenged orthodox
assumptions of the legitimate limits on judicial review in the Australian
constitutional system. In the years since Deane's departure from the Court the concept of 'the people'
as the source of the Constitution's authority has gained wide acceptance. Few
have also accepted Deane's bold vision of the Court's duty to protect the
fundamental rights of 'the people' from legislative interference. Until this
aspect of Deane's constitutional vision is adopted, some of his more
controversial interpretations of the Constitution are unlikely to gain the
acceptance of a majority of the Court. However, much of Deane's jurisprudence
displays his reliance on his distinctive concept of 'the people' to support the
application of both established principles of constitutional interpretation and a number of innovative interpretive principles to derive moderate conclusions on
the meaning and effect of the Constitution. For this reason, Deane's
jurisprudence contains many fresh and compelling answers to questions
regarding the meaning of the Constitution in contemporary Australia.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.