Skip navigation
Skip navigation

'Equality of rights for every civilised man South of the Zambezi': Electoral engineering in Southern Rhodesia, 1957-65

Fraenkel, Jon

Description

The Southern Rhodesian experiment with the alternative vote (AV) is not well known among electoral specialists. Yet this was the origin of the better known claim that such a preferential voting system might ameliorate ethnic tensions in deeply divided societies. AV was one among several institutional innovations deployed by a reformist white settler government in Southern Rhodesia in response to the emergence of the African nationalist movement. Despite its usage with a highly restrictive...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorFraenkel, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:19:41Z
dc.identifier.issn0305-7070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/103008
dc.description.abstractThe Southern Rhodesian experiment with the alternative vote (AV) is not well known among electoral specialists. Yet this was the origin of the better known claim that such a preferential voting system might ameliorate ethnic tensions in deeply divided societies. AV was one among several institutional innovations deployed by a reformist white settler government in Southern Rhodesia in response to the emergence of the African nationalist movement. Despite its usage with a highly restrictive franchise, the system delivered a preference transfer-dependent victory for a centrist government that aimed to accommodate African political aspirations in 1958. Yet that outcome was not repeated in 1962 or 1965, when Ian Smith’s Rhodesia Front instead obtained office, declared independence from the United Kingdom and – once freed of restraints from London – dismantled electoral devices aimed at encouraging inter-communal vote transfers. This article examines the debates about Southern Rhodesian electoral reform in the late 1950s and early 1960s, explores the working of accommodation-oriented devices at the elections of 1958, 1962 and 1965, and contests whether viable political settlements can be assembled in such contexts simply by institutional reform aimed at encouraging ‘moderation’.
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing Ltd.
dc.sourceJournal of Southern African Studies
dc.title'Equality of rights for every civilised man South of the Zambezi': Electoral engineering in Southern Rhodesia, 1957-65
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume41
dc.date.issued2015
local.identifier.absfor160609 - Political Theory and Political Philosophy
local.identifier.ariespublicationU3488905xPUB13578
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationFraenkel, Jon, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1167
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1180
local.identifier.doi10.1080/03057070.2015.1116231
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:42:01Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84957649253
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Fraenkel_%27Equality_of_rights_for_every_2015.pdf516.33 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator