The precariousness of the glass cliff: How gender stereotypes affect leader evaluations

dc.contributor.authorRyan, Michelle K.en
dc.contributor.authorStoker, Janka I.en
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T18:40:56Z
dc.date.available2026-01-01T18:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.description.abstractTwo studies examined evaluations of female and male leaders across two crisis-situations (with or without social resources). In the situation without social resources, a female leader was evaluated more positively because of her ability to establish acceptance (Study 1). This effect is driven by the stereotypical belief that female leaders possess communal traits (Study 2). Where social resources are available, people reverted to a think manager - think male association, evaluating a male leader more positively.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent6en
dc.identifier.issn0065-0668en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-1091-9275/work/177036673en
dc.identifier.scopus85026226137en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733801951
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries72nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2012en
dc.sourceAcademy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedingsen
dc.titleThe precariousness of the glass cliff: How gender stereotypes affect leader evaluationsen
dc.typeConference paperen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage742en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage737en
local.contributor.affiliationRyan, Michelle K.; Faculty of Economics and Businessen
local.contributor.affiliationStoker, Janka I.; University of Groningenen
local.identifier.doi10.5465/AMBPP.2012.110en
local.identifier.pure2d3aac5f-d6a6-422f-a770-1caa31e9f368en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85026226137en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads