Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework

dc.contributor.authorCatford, Jane A.en
dc.contributor.authorJansson, Rolanden
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Christeren
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T23:31:57Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T23:31:57Z
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.description.abstractAim: Invasion ecology includes many hypotheses. Empirical evidence suggests that most of these can explain the success of some invaders to some degree in some circumstances. If they all are correct, what does this tell us about invasion? We illustrate the major themes in invasion ecology, and provide an overarching framework that helps organize research and foster links among subfields of invasion ecology and ecology more generally. Location: Global. Methods: We review and synthesize 29 leading hypotheses in plant invasion ecology. Structured around propagule pressure (P), abiotic characteristics (A) and biotic characteristics (B), with the additional influence of humans (H) on P, A and B (hereon PAB), we show how these hypotheses fit into one paradigm. P is based on the size and frequency of introductions, A incorporates ecosystem invasibility based on physical conditions, and B includes the characteristics of invading species (invasiveness), the recipient community and their interactions. Having justified the PAB framework, we propose a way in which invasion research could progress. Results: By highlighting the common ground among hypotheses, we show that invasion ecology is encumbered by theoretical redundancy that can be removed through integration. Using both holistic and incremental approaches, we show how the PAB framework can guide research and quantify the relative importance of different invasion mechanisms. Main conclusions: If the prime aim is to identify the main cause of invasion success, we contend that a top-down approach that focuses on PAB maximizes research efficiency. This approach identifies the most influential factors first, and subsequently narrows the number of potential causal mechanisms. By viewing invasion as a multifaceted process that can be partitioned into major drivers and broken down into a series of sequential steps, invasion theory can be rigorously tested, understanding improved and effective weed management techniques identified.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent19en
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-0582-5960/work/171152279en
dc.identifier.scopus57349187789en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349187789&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755612
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceDiversity and Distributionsen
dc.subjectBiological invasionsen
dc.subjectCommunity ecologyen
dc.subjectDarwinen
dc.subjectEltonen
dc.subjectInvadersen
dc.subjectSynthesisen
dc.titleReducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical frameworken
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage40en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage22en
local.contributor.affiliationCatford, Jane A.; University of Melbourneen
local.contributor.affiliationJansson, Roland; Umeå Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationNilsson, Christer; Umeå Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume15en
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.xen
local.identifier.pureab565ad8-e656-4f99-90e2-6f75bef73a31en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/57349187789en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads