Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service

dc.contributor.authorBatterham, Philip J.en
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Melonieen
dc.contributor.authorCalear, Alison L.en
dc.contributor.authorCherbuin, Nicolasen
dc.contributor.authorRomaniuk, Madelineen
dc.contributor.authorBanfield, Michelleen
dc.contributor.authorButterworth, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorBurvill, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorMassang, Danielen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T20:30:44Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T20:30:44Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Outcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders. Objective: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families. Method: Twenty-nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data. Results: Clients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework. Conclusions: Findings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client-led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by funding from the Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs. The funder had oversight of the publication. ALC is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant 1173146. Open access publishing facilitated by Australian National University, as part of the Wiley \u2010 Australian National University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent10en
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294en
dc.identifier.otherWOS:001269684500001en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-9408-3470/work/170909390en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-7028-725X/work/170909524en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-6481-0748/work/170909749en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-3024-1687/work/170909777en
dc.identifier.scopus85198119859en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198119859&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755411
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.sourceJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practiceen
dc.subjectassessmenten
dc.subjectmonitoringen
dc.subjectoutcomesen
dc.subjectpreferencesen
dc.titleStaff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health serviceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationBatterham, Philip J.; Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMartin, Melonie; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCalear, Alison L.; Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationCherbuin, Nicolas; Department of Health Services Research & Policy, Department of Health Economics, Wellbeing and Society, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationRomaniuk, Madeline; Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBanfield, Michelle; Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationButterworth, Peter; Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationBurvill, Michael; Australian Governmenten
local.contributor.affiliationMassang, Daniel; Australian Governmenten
local.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.14085en
local.identifier.pure5d99ff14-7220-4cff-b3da-e00759190cdeen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198119859en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads