Correction to

Abstract

Following publication of the original article the following errors were reported: The heading for the Methods section was formatted incorrectly. In Table 1 the heading ‘ONT’ was formatted such that it applied to all three sub-headings ‘Raw’, ‘Filtered’, and ‘HiFi’, but it should only apply to the first two sub-headings. The heading ‘PacBio’ has been added above ‘HiFi’ for clarity. The incorrect and correct Table 1 are shown in this Correction. The caption for Fig. 2 was wrong. The incorrect and correct caption is given in this Correction. Several Latin terms – ‘E. regnans’, ‘Eucalyptus’ – were not consistently italicized and this has been corrected. Incorrect Table 1: ONT HiFi Raw Filtered 92.07 23.53 21.34 167.39 42.78 38.81 15.80 46.73 48.35 Number (1,000) 6,482.95 718.32 467.74 47.93 219.14 219.14 105 36 20,000 Correct Table 1: PacBio ONT HiFi Raw Filtered 92.07 23.53 21.34 167.39 42.78 38.81 15.80 46.73 48.35 Number (1,000) 6,482.95 718.32 467.74 47.93 219.14 219.14 105 36 20,000 Long-read sequencing statistics and Hi-C contact map. (A) Summary statistics for all assembly sequencing data (HiFi, raw ONT, and filtered ONT). (B) Violin plot of read quality scores. (C) Violin plot of sequencing read lengths. (D) Hi-C contact map of scaffolded contigs in E. regnans haplotype (1) E) Hi-C contact map of scaffolded contigs in E. regnans haplotype (2) Hi-C contact heatmaps were visualised with Juicebox [22]. Long-read sequencing statistics and Hi-C contact map. (A) Violin plot of read quality scores. (B) Violin plot of sequencing read lengths. (C) Hi-C contact map of scaffolded contigs in E. regnans haplotype 1 D) Hi-C contact map of scaffolded contigs in E. regnans haplotype 2. Hi-C contact heatmaps were visualised with Juicebox [22]. The original article has been updated. Show more