A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness Evaluations
Date
Authors
Berman, Glen
Goyal, Nitesh
Madaio, Michael
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Access Statement
Abstract
Responsible design of AI systems is a shared goal across HCI and AI communities. Responsible AI (RAI) tools have been developed to support practitioners to identify, assess, and mitigate ethical issues during AI development. These tools take many forms (e.g., design playbooks, software toolkits, documentation protocols). However, research suggests that use of RAI tools is shaped by organizational contexts, raising questions about how effective such tools are in practice. To better understand how RAI tools are—and might be—evaluated, we conducted a qualitative analysis of 37 publications that discuss evaluations of RAI tools. We find that most evaluations focus on usability, while questions of tools’ effectiveness in changing AI development are sidelined. While usability evaluations are an important approach to evaluate RAI tools, we draw on evaluation approaches from other fields to highlight developer- and community-level steps to support evaluations of RAI tools’ effectiveness in shaping AI development practices and outcomes.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
CHI '24: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Publication
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description