Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Ranking systemically important financial institutions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Dungey, Mardi
Luciani, Matteo
Veredas, David

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

We propose a simple network-based methodology for ranking systemically important financial institutions. We view the risks of firms -including both the financial sector and the real economy- as a network with nodes representing the volatility shocks. The metric for the connections of the nodes is the correlation between these shocks. Daily dynamic centrality measures allow us to rank firms in terms of risk connectedness and firm characteristics. We present a general systemic risk index for the financial sector. Results from applying this approach to all firms in the S&P500 for 2003-2011 are twofold. First, Bank of America, JP Morgan and Wells Fargo are consistently in the top 10 throughout the sample. Citigroup and Lehman Brothers also were consistently in the top 10 up to late 2008. At the end of the sample, insurance firms emerge as systemic. Second, the systemic risk in the financial sector built-up from early 2005, peaked in September 2008, and greatly reduced after the introduction of TARP and the rescue of AIG. Anxiety about European debt markets saw the systemic risk begin to rise again from April 2010. We further decompose these results to find that the systemic risk of insurance and deposit-taking institutions differs importantly, the latter experienced a decline from late 2007, in line with the burst of the housing price bubble, while the former continued to climb up to the rescue of AIG.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Papers

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until