What's in a second opinion? Shadowing the ECB and the Bank of England
Loading...
Date
Authors
Neuenkirch, Matthias
Siklos, Pierre L.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University
Access Statement
Open Access
Abstract
One way of evaluating how well monetary authorities perform is to provide the public with a regular and independent second opinion. The European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of England (BoE) are shadowed by professional and academic economists who provide a separate policy rate recommendation in advance of the central bank announcement. In this paper, we systematically evaluate this second opinion and find that, first, the shadow committee of the ECB tends to be relatively less inflation averse than the ECB. In contrast, the shadow committee of the BoE proposes a more hawkish monetary policy stance than the BoE. Second, consensus within a shadow committee is far easier to reach when there is no pressure to change the policy rate. Third, the ECB's shadow committee is more activist than the ECB's Governing Council and a larger degree of consensus within the former brings about a greater likelihood that the two committees will agree.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis Working Papers
Book Title
Entity type
Publication
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description