Catastrophe, autonomy and the future of modernism: Trying to understand Adorno's reading of Endgame

dc.contributor.authorHolt, Matthewen
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T14:40:55Z
dc.date.available2025-12-17T14:40:55Z
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.description.abstractTheodor Adorno's essay "Trying to Understand Endgame" never refuses the challenge to interpret Endgame but it does not for one moment pretend that theory can unlock the meanings of an aesthetic object without putting its own processes, concepts and style into question - a challenge that is posed by the aesthetic object itself. The autonomy of Beckett's art must be acknowledged yet at the same time be seen to engage in the most demanding questions of our time. How Adorno manages to keep the critical force of these axioms together is the subject of this essay. Far from being rendered irrelevant by postmodernism, I argue in the conclusion that such a critical project provokes the question of the future of modernism, not its demise.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent16en
dc.identifier.issn0927-3131en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-9913-177X/work/162951348en
dc.identifier.scopus60950635516en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733796003
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceSamuel Beckett Today - Aujourd huien
dc.titleCatastrophe, autonomy and the future of modernism: Trying to understand Adorno's reading of Endgameen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage275en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage260en
local.contributor.affiliationHolt, Matthew; School of Cybernetics, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume14en
local.identifier.doi10.1163/18757405-90000192en
local.identifier.puref5acb0fa-28c6-4c02-9a3d-89f07f4b49dfen
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/60950635516en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads