Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Negotiating water : conflict resolution in Australian water management

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra : Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

When the Australian nation was formed in 1901 as a voluntary federation, there was no external threat or bitterness towards the colonial power, Britain. The country was relatively free of many of the inherent sources of conflicts in Europe/for example a rigid class structure. This was reflected in the rise of the political power of labour during the 19th century. However, in stark contrast, colonial and early Australian attitudes to the natural environment and Aborigines were characterised by conflict and exploitation. The last two decades or so have seen these attitudes substantially overturned. This is part of a broad societal desire for more accountable or 'open' government and greater equity. Until the early 1980s, the relatively high per capita abundance of water caused little competition despite the profligate use. Conflict was limited to problems within the Murray-Darling basin, and more local disputes such as those in Perth and the Hunter Valley. The three best endowed states and territories each use less than 1.5 per cent of their mean annual supply. In contrast, South Australia utilises over 30 per cent. The major share of the utilised resource is for irrigation which consumes some 70 per cent of the national total, with about 50 per cent of all the nation's harvested water being used for irrigation in the Murray-Darling Basin. Readily available, good quality water resources for the major conurbations are progressively becoming subject to increasing conflict. Another set of problems arises from the discharge of sewage effluent. These problems have progressively highlighted the need for water planning and emphasised the potential for increased use of techniques for conflict resolution. National trends in water planning and management include: the use of market mechanisms; 'corporatisation' of public service organisations; and the development of environmental and social concerns. Reaching agreement among the diversity of interests in water resources today is one of the greatest challenges facing all countries as they adapt to more sustainable development. The ability to avoid and resolve protracted conflict is central to success. This applies to the management of not only water but of all natural resources. More fundamentally, it applies to all aspects of government. It is for these reasons that this introduction begins by briefly examining the distinctive experience with conßict and its resolution in Australian society before focusing on water management in Australia. This establishes the context in which the following chapters analyse the strategies and recent experience in reaching agreement in the management of water and associated natural resources.

Description

Includes bibliographical references.

Citation

Collections

Source

Type

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads