Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Knowledge Argument, Diaphanousness, Representationalism

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Jackson, Frank

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This chapter develops a representationalist view about perceptual experience and defends its application to the knowledge argument. This view is based partly on the idea that perceptual experience is diaphanous - in other words, that accessing the nature of the experience itself is nothing other than accessing the properties of its object. It is argued that although the diaphanousness thesis alone does not entail representationalism, the thesis supports an inference from a weaker to a stronger version of representationalism. On the weak version, perceptual experience is essentially representational. On the strong version, how an experience represents things as being exhausts its experiential nature. Strong representationalism undermines the claim that Mary learns new truths when she leaves the room.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until