Holevo Cramér-Rao bound: How close can we get without entangling measurements?

dc.contributor.authorDas, Aritraen
dc.contributor.authorConlon, Lorcanen
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Junen
dc.contributor.authorYung, Simonen
dc.contributor.authorLam, Pingen
dc.contributor.authorAssad, Syeden
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T20:40:28Z
dc.date.available2025-12-19T20:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-30en
dc.description.abstractIn multi-parameter quantum metrology, the resource of entanglement can lead to an increase in efficiency of the estimation process. Entanglement can be used in the state preparation stage, or the measurement stage, or both, to harness this advantage; here we focus on the role of entangling measurements. Specifically, entangling or collective measurements over multiple identical copies of a probe state are known to be superior to measuring each probe individually, but the extent of this improvement is an open problem. It is also known that such entangling measurements, though resource-intensive, are required to attain the ultimate limits in multi-parameter quantum metrology and quantum information processing tasks. In this work we investigate the maximum precision improvement that collective quantum measurements can offer over individual measurements for estimating parameters of qudit states, calling this the 'collective quantum enhancement'. We show that, whereas the maximum enhancement can, in principle, be a factor of n for estimating n parameters, this bound is not tight for large n. Instead, our results prove an enhancement linear in dimension of the qudit is possible using collective measurements and lead us to conjecture that this is the maximum collective quantum enhancement in any local estimation scenario.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence CE170100012. This research was also supported by A*STAR C230917010, Emerging Technology and A*STAR C230917004, Quantum Sensing. JS is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP21K11749, JP24K14816. We are grateful to the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) for their super-computing resources that were used for numerical investigations.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent38en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7840-5292/work/199490404en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-4421-601X/work/199490852en
dc.identifier.scopus105018003434en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733796728
dc.language.isoenen
dc.provenancePublished under CC-BY 4.0.en
dc.rights© 2025 The Authorsen
dc.sourceQuantumen
dc.titleHolevo Cramér-Rao bound: How close can we get without entangling measurements?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1905en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1867en
local.contributor.affiliationDas, Aritra; ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationConlon, Lorcan; Quantum Innovation Centre (Q.InC)en
local.contributor.affiliationSuzuki, Jun; National University of Singaporeen
local.contributor.affiliationYung, Simon; ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationLam, Ping; Research School of Physics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationAssad, Syed; Department of Quantum Science & Technology, Research School of Physics, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume9en
local.identifier.doi10.22331/q-2025-09-30-1867en
local.identifier.pureb90fa61b-4263-422e-9259-917d5cdaf939en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
q-2025-09-30-1867.pdf
Size:
8.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format