Intersections: Between Khatam Qur’ans and Slametans: Gender and Class in South Asian and Indonesian Interdomestic Rituals

Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacific
Issue 43, July 2019

Between Khatam Qur’ans and Slametans:
Gender and Class in South Asian and Indonesian Interdomestic Rituals

Pnina Werbner

Introduction

The historiographies of South Asian and Indonesian Islams—both regions on the periphery of the Muslim heartland—highlight the way scholarly traditions gloss apparently quite different, yet startlingly similar, traditions of ritual practice and belief. As regional conversations develop over time, however, a convergence may emerge where previously difference was stressed, and along with this revised scholarly recognition of resemblance, the disclosure of actual historical connections may come to replace earlier disjunctions.

The present paper interrogates this process by drawing a comparison between two commonplace everyday rituals in Indonesia and Muslim South Asia—the slametan and the khatam qur’an. At stake in this comparison, I shall argue, is not only the place of gender in these rituals but of class as well.

It is worth reminding ourselves at the outset of Clifford Geertz's original insight into what he describes as a 'core' ritual:

At the centre of the whole Javanese religious system lies a simple, formal, undramatic, almost furtive, little ritual: the slametan … [it] is the Javanese version of what is perhaps the world's most common religious ritual, the communal feast, and, as almost everywhere, it symbolises the mystic and social unity of those participating in it. Friends, neighbours, fellow workers, relatives, local spirits, dead ancestors, and near-forgotten gods all get bound, by virtue of their commensality, into a defined social group pledged to mutual support and cooperation.[1]

In Geertz's ethnography, the slametan is depicted as primarily a neighbourhood, household-centred ritual attended and convened by men. Held in the front of the house, it consists of an appeal to a range of indigenous spirits and ancestors to whom food and incense are dedicated, before the men partake of some of the food and then, wrapped in banana leaves, carry it to be consumed in their own houses nearby with their families. In The Religion of Java the slametan is conceived of, above all, as a ritual held by the 'Abangan' peasantry, still immersed in pre-Islamic beliefs in spirits. The ritual virtually disappears in the book when Geertz turns to discuss the Santri, the urban reformist Muslims, and the Prijaji, the urban elites and aristocracy who command Javanese high culture and art. If the slametan is a 'furtive' little village ritual, it vanishes from sight among educated townspeople, men and women (though we are told everybody still convenes it).

Equally furtive, perhaps, despite similarly being a core ritual, khatme qur’an are virtually absent in scholarly writings on Pakistan and Muslim South Asia.[2] I first encountered the ritual in Manchester, UK, in 1975, and, much like Geertz found in Java, observed that it was repeatedly convened in response to a myriad of occasions, from dangerous accidents to thanksgiving or fulfilment of a vow. It was also, as in Indonesia, a domestic ritual, convened by a family or household. This set it off from other public ritual observances, though khatme qur’an are also held in the mosque when a person dies. In South Asia, as elsewhere in the Muslim world, the mosque is above all the domain of men and serves as a backdrop for the performance of communal rituals and festivals, for theological punditry and for political-cum-ethnic organisations. Domestic rituals are held in the home and are often dominated by women. The congregation attending these rituals is selected by the conveners and represents, as in Indonesia, their significant circle of friends, kinsmen and neighbours.

In the present paper, I argue that there are striking similarities in the way that both the slametan and the khatam qur’an rituals allow for the creation of an everyday interdomestic domain controlled in large measure by women and based on female networking. Class and gender intersect in such networks, leading to different configurations of inter-household relations in villages, neighbourhoods and urban contexts.

The khatam qur’an

Of all domestic rituals convened at home, perhaps the most central is this relatively simple, unelaborated ritual that most resembles the slametan in Indonesia. It is known as khatam qur’an, the 'completion' or 'sealing' of the Qur’an, or qur’an sherif, the 'noble', 'beautiful' Qur’an. In times of danger, thanksgiving or transition, Pakistanis convene their fellow migrants for a ritual of formal prayer and commensality. Like the slametan for the Javanese,[3] this seemingly simple ritual lies at the heart of Pakistani religious observance and may be regarded as a 'core ritual'.[4] It is performed by a congregation composed mostly of women who are gathered in the house of the ritual convener. Between them the assembled guests read the entire Qur’an in one sitting. Each of the participants reads one or more chapters (siparas) out of the thirty in the Qur’an. The reading is dedicated to the person convening the event, and is regarded as a service performed by the readers for the convener and his or her family. After the reading of the Qur’an has been completed at least once, a du'a (supplication) is uttered over an offering of food, which is distributed to the guests. In Pakistan a share of the food is set aside for the poor as charity (sadqa), but this is not done in Manchester as 'there are no poor people here'. By custom, the Qur’an should be read with absolute accuracy, so as not to confuse Arabic words which vary only slightly in their spelling. A high degree of ritualism thus characterises one part of the proceedings. Otherwise, the structure of the ritual is very simple, and it contains little figurative elaboration.

Despite this apparent simplicity, however, the ritual embraces central religious and moral ideas and forms the basic model for a series of other rituals; all concerned with the two themes of sacrifice and prayer. The analysis of labour migrants' perceptions of the ritual, and of related rituals, brings into sharp focus what they consider are the fundamental features of the rites. It thus highlights the crucial elements of sacrifice and offering from a novel angle, lending some credence to certain approaches in the general debate about sacrifice and offering.

Khatme qur’an gatherings constitute important loci of interhousehold women-centred sociability. Along with weddings they constitute the 'interdomestic domain', mediating between the purely domestic and the public domains. The performance of khatme qur’an was a feature of migrant life mostly absent during the all-male, initial phase of migration, and only introduced into Britain with the arrival of wives and families. The form of the ritual is very widespread and appears in different variations from North Africa, throughout the Middle East and South Asia, to Indonesia. It has Hindu and Sikh variations.[5] Its structure is almost everywhere essentially the same, with a sacred book being read first, often in an esoteric language, followed by a meal or fruit offering. In the Hindu version, this food is first offered to an image of a god or goddess, but this act is, of course, absent in the Islamic form of the ritual. Despite its ubiquity, there appear to be few anthropological accounts of the ritual and its sociological or symbolic significance.

Symbolically, the moral attachment of a family to its current home and surroundings is tangibly expressed during khatme qur’an through a transformation of secular into sacred space. One room in the convener's house—and, by extension, the whole house—assumes, temporarily, certain features of a mosque. Shoes are taken off at the threshold to the room, and people read the Qur’an seated on the ground. Along with the burning of incense, these observances serve to define the space as holy or sacred. The following description sets out the basic features of the ritual.

The food prayed over at the completion of a Qur’an reading consists, usually, of water, milk, a sweet dish, rice and fruit. The fruit is distributed first, immediately after the reading is completed, while the readers are still reclined on the floor. The selection blessed is representative of abundance, purity and the essential ingredients of a meal. The portion of the food prayed over is distributed first in order to ensure that it is entirely consumed, and none thrown away.

The countering of misfortune

Occasional khatme qur’an gatherings are held in order to ask for forgiveness (bakhsh), thanksgiving (shukriya) and divine blessing (barkat or barakain Arabic). Although the three notions appear at first glance to be different, the ideas surrounding them are closely linked.[6] The emphasis depends on the occasion. If the khatam qur’an is held to celebrate recovery from an illness, it is held for shukriya, thanksgiving. Since, however, there has been, it is believed, an unwanted intervention by God or spirits, a sin possibly committed either knowingly or unknowingly, an act of expiation is also involved. The convener is thus seeking to rid him/herself of the condition which caused the misfortune or affliction (bala, musibat) while at the same time seeking barkat. Hence, the ritual is intended to transform the state of the convener from that induced by negative intervention or lack of divine protection into one of barkat endowed through positive divine intervention. Barkat is thus the obverse of affliction. This opposition is expressed in the formal structure and permutations of different offerings or sacrifices Pakistanis make.

The khatam qur’an ritual is divided into two key phases. In the first phase the Qur’an is read. This is the phase of consecration. In the second phase, food, which constitutes, in part at least, an offering, is presented to the assembled congregation. The two phases, although closely linked, represent two separate religious acts, each surrounded by a set of theological and cosmological beliefs.

The central feature of the first ritual phase is the recitation of the Qur’an. This recitation is considered to have immense power. The divine force invoked in the recitation has the power to expel evil spirits and to protect against them. The reading of the Qur’an also evokes barkat, which is then imparted to the food served. Barkat, or baraka in Arabic, is a 'beneficent force, of divine origin, which causes superabundance in the physical sphere and prosperity and happiness in the psychic order.'[7] The text of the Qur’an is charged with barkat. A khatam qur’an is intended to transform the state of the convener into one of barkat, which is also shared by those reading the Qur’an in his or her name. The complete recitation of the Qur’an, especially if done in a short time, is considered a meritorious achievement. Pakistanis say they read the whole Qur’an because they 'cannot be quite sure what particular passage suits the occasion', and this is particularly so where danger is present. The Qur’an, they say, includes a saying for every type of occasion, but the location and meaning of these passages is known only to God. By reading the Qur’an in its entirety, they ensure that they have read the appropriate passage. In this way they hope to influence God, which is the intention of the khatam.

This type of explanation dearly stresses the substantive or magical power of the Qur’an in invoking God and influencing the spirits. The Qur’an objectifies the power of God, and the stress is on this objective power which is contained in the word or text of the Qur’an and is transferred metonymically to the convener and the congregation. This objectification is indicated by the great emphasis placed on an accurate reading. There must be no change of zabar or pech (minor vowel marks in Arabic), for this might change the meaning of the word. Indeed, the Qur’an is read in Arabic, which few Pakistanis understand (although most migrants have, of course, read the Urdu translation of the Qur’an).

In an alternative explanation, the morality of the Qur’an is emphasised. The Qur’an contains 'all the laws and sayings needed to live a good life'. When moving to a new house, I was told, it is right that the whole Qur’an be read. Where the Qur’an has been read, one is reluctant to sin or, if one does sin, one feels guilty about it.

Although the Qur’an is the book most commonly read in Manchester, on different occasions different books may be read. In one variation, held exclusively by women, stories of Fatimah are read. In another variation known as Milad various sayings of the Prophet (hadith, kalma, gyarvi sherif) and stories about the life of the Prophet are read. Usually one person leads the reading, while in between passages proverbs and nats (praise poems) are sung by the congregation. Milads are usually held on joyful occasions. Whatever the script read, the attendant women must be ritually pure (pak bilkul), that is they must not be menstruating, and they must have performed their ablutions before the reading. I witnessed a Milad in Pakistan held by Sayyid women at the beginning of a saint's ’urs (festival).

Sacrifice and the mediation of the poor

Going against the objective power of the Qur’an as a book containing barkat is the notion of intention or niyat (niya in Arabic) central to Islamic religious observance. While much emphasis is placed on the accurate reading of the Qur’an, the reading is followed by a prayer over the food asking God for forgiveness for any errors made in the proceedings. Pakistanis are clear that the intention supersedes the ritualistic aspects of the event. Perhaps the most important difference between the two phases of the ritual—the Qur’an reading and the offering made—relates to this distinction. Paradoxically, perhaps, the reading of the Qur’an represents the more ritualistic phase, while the commensal meal and the associated offering given away to the poor are closely tied to the intention of the convener. And, moreover, the difference between the way in which offerings are made is linked to subtle differences in intention rather than in the form of food or money given away. Was the khatam held for shukriya (thanksgiving), for barkat, during illness, to consecrate a new house? The intention is all important.

The problem of how to manage misfortune or deal with affliction is at the heart of all these observances. Pakistanis tell me that, according to Islam, nothing happens without the will (raza) and knowledge of God. Hence their view of affliction and misfortune is closely related to their view of the moral order, of good and evil in the eyes of God. A serious illness or misfortune is believed to be caused by the intervention of evil spirits, and these can only be exorcised with God's help. Indeed, they should not have afflicted a person in the first place unless he or she lacked divine protection. In cases where khatme qur’an or sacrifices are performed for a person who is seriously ill or has a chronic illness or an unnatural or difficult condition (such as barrenness in women), or in times of misfortune or trouble (bala), the ritual is held for the explicit purpose of expelling evil spirits through the recitation of the Qur’an and through almsgiving. Some migrants, who deny the presence of evil spirits even in the case of serious illness, talk instead of the presence of misfortune or danger caused, in their view, by sin. It is the misfortune, musibat (or bala), which a person rids him or herself of through almsgiving and prayer. Reading the Qur’an is seen both as a protection against such misfortune and as a means of exorcising evil spirits or jinns.

Not all khatme qur’an rituals are associated, however, with exorcism, or. even primarily with expiation since, as we have seen, many are intended to seek divine blessing or as thanksgiving, after the danger has departed. As will be seen, the ritual stress dictates the ritual form. In Luc de Heusch's terms, the intended effect is 'conjunction' (e.g. communion) or 'disjunction' (e.g. exorcism).[8]

A crucial feature of offering or sacrifice in this regard has to do with what parts of a sacrificial victim or offering are consumed and what parts are given away or destroyed. In substituting a 'sacrificial schema' for a prior evolutionary model of sacrifice, Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss recognised the highly complex but nevertheless ordered variation in sacrificial procedures, even within a single society. Crucial to this schema was a distinction between sacrifices of sacralisation and desacralisation, and although de Heusch has recently criticised this contrast,[9] it remains—perhaps in modified form—fundamental for an analysis of the transformation through sacrifice of relations between the gods, the sacrificer and the congregation participating in the ritual.

From this perspective, the significance of the commensal meal following the Qur’an reading cannot be understood apart from other practices of Pakistani sacrifice. Hence, true sacrifice, that is the ritual slaughtering of an animal, may take a number of different forms. In Manchester, many Pakistani migrants perform animal sacrifices locally on two main occasions: at the annual Eid Zoha festival and after the birth of a child, particularly a son. The first sacrifice is known as qurbani, the second as haqiqa. The structure of the qurbani sacrifice represents an explicit model for the proper division of an animal in personal sacrifice, where the ritual act is intended to be both piacular and for the sake of divine blessing.

Qurbani sacrifices are performed to commemorate the binding of Ismail by his father Ibrahim (the Islamic version of the binding of Isaac by Abraham in the Old Testament). This myth, whether in its Biblical or Qur’anic form, exemplifies the principle of substitution of a life for a life in sacrifice. According to Islamic tradition the baqra (sacrificial victim) is supposed to be divided into three equal parts, with a third shared by the family of the sacrificer, a third by kinsmen and friends, and a third given away to 'the poor'. In Manchester, since 'there are no poor', I was told, two-thirds are given away to kinsmen and friends.

As performed locally, the sacrificial victim is slaughtered in the very early hours of the morning of the festival, either by the local Muslim butcher or by the sacrificer himself, who accompanies the butcher to the local abattoir. Often several families join in making a single sacrifice, usually a lamb. The sacrificial victim is then cut up by the butcher and divided into portions. After the morning prayers members of a family gather for a mid-day meal, and in this a third of the victim is shared. The sacrificer allocates the rest of the meat, usually divided into two-pound portions, among his neighbours and friends living in Manchester. Usually, he knocks on the door of each house he visits and hands the meat over to the person on the threshold, telling him or her that it is qurbani. If the people are close friends, he enters the house, but if they are mere acquaintances he will usually hand over the meat on the threshold to whoever opens the door. In some cases I found that people were not quite sure of all the families who had presented them with qurbani that year. It may happen that the meat is handed over on the doorstep to one of the children who does not remember the name of the donor. Knowing who brought qurbani is not very important, for no expectation of reciprocity is implied, and no debt has been incurred. The sacrifice is made in the name of God (khuda da nam) by the sacrificer and his family, in order to gain merit or to expiate sin.

The choice of persons to whom qurbani is given is not, however, arbitrary or accidental, but follows a similar pattern to the choice of partners in other rituals which migrants perform. In the central residential cluster —where neighbours are usually known —they receive a fair share of the meat. Among businessmen and professionals living in the inner suburbs qurbani is distributed among friends. Other migrants, among those living on the periphery of the central cluster, avoid performing qurbani locally altogether. Instead, they send money for it to be performed in Pakistan.

The qurbani sacrifice contrasts significantly with another form of personal sacrifice known as sadqa (from the Arabic sadaqa, a term also used for almsgiving in general). Sadqa sacrifices are always performed in Pakistan. They are preceded by a khatam qur’an and are held, I am told, 'for the life'; if someone is mortally ill or has escaped a very bad accident, a sadqa sacrifice is made. The idea appears to be one of substitution, and the unusual aspect of this type of sacrifice for Pakistanis is that the animal is given away to the poor in its entirety. Neither the sacrificer nor any of his kinsmen are supposed to partake of the sacrificial victim. To do so would be to detract from the efficacy of the ritual act. In cases of abnormal illness, I was told, the meat is not even given to the poor, but is thrown away.

Two beliefs are implicit in sadqa sacrifice among Pakistanis. On the one hand, as the name of the sacrifice—sadqa—indicates, the sacrifice is an extreme act of almsgiving. On the other hand, it is also an act of expulsion of evil spirits or misfortune. For Pakistanis there is no belief that a sacrifice should be burnt or destroyed, nor is there an explicit view that the 'life of the flesh is in the blood' (Leviticus 17:11). There is, moreover, no sacred altar or shrine. The idea that God is partaking directly of any tangible substance, such as the blood of the animal, is abhorrent.[10] The blood of a sacrificial victim is for Muslims haram, that is, prohibited and sacred. Their view is that the flow of blood signals the intention and removes all impurities before the animal is shared and consumed. In other words, the flow of the blood is a purificatory element of the sacrifice.

Islam recognises, moreover, no priestly order. Nor do the poor constitute scapegoats, bearing or accumulating the sins of the donors.[11] The gift to the poor completes and seals the act of offering or sacrifice.[12] Communication in sacrifice is therefore achieved for Pakistanis indirectly, via the poor, and through an act of giving. Who are 'the poor' (lokan gharib)? For Muslims the poor may include any person, even members of one's own kin group or village, such as widows or orphans. They do not form a clear category of outsiders, and this is made quite explicit in the Qur’an. The notion of 'the poor' cuts across the categories of family, friends and fellow villagers, such as low caste or landless labourers, to embrace the widest humanity Pakistanis recognise: the beggars around saints' tombs, or the residents of orphanages, leper homes, etc. I was frequently told that I could not imagine real poverty, living in Britain. There are, moreover, no persons in Britain willing to define themselves as poor and take the remains of a commensal meal or sacrifice. It is worth noting here that although the part of the meal given away to the poor is the equivalent of the juts, or leftovers, given among Hindus to lower castes, the Islamic idea of giving to the poor is not as clearly predicated on a notion of intrinsic inequality. It does, however, presume the existence of hierarchy. It implies real inequalities in wealth and property as a 'natural' feature of society. Thus it is that offering and sacrifice fit into a more general pattern of a hierarchical gift economy that I have described elsewhere.[13]

Pakistani labour migrants universally direct their almsgiving via the mosque or various charities towards Pakistan. If they hold khatme qur’an offerings, qurbani or haqiqa in Manchester, it is because they feel that the further crucial social category of friends is present here. Without sharing among friends, there is no commensal meal, no barkat, no communication with the divine. It is possible to hold all these rituals by proxy, through kinsmen at home, in Pakistan. The sacrificer sends the money for a meal to be prepared or a beast slaughtered in his or her name. Many migrants, especially the more recent arrivals of village origin, virtually always perform these rituals at home. Perhaps for them, more than for middle-class, urban migrants, the poor are a known and personalised group. The village or home neighbourhood remains the focus of their significant relations; they remain rooted back home, symbolically, emotionally, experientially. Yet over time, they too come under increasing communal and social pressure to reconstitute a moral universe in Britain. Like the slametan in Indonesia, the ritual 'symbolises the mystic and social unity of those participating in it'.[14]

South Asia and Indonesia compared

I have described the khatam qur’an ritual in some depth in order to tease out its comparability with the slametan, before going on to analyse its gendered and classed dimensions. A striking feature elided in the early historiographical accounts of the ritual in Indonesia relates to the belief in evil spirits, jinns, etc. In fact, such beliefs are common in both Indonesia and South Asia, although in South Asia a multitude of invisible agents is regarded as part of Islam, and even mentioned in the Qur’an, whereas in Indonesia, as argued by Geertz, for example, these spiritual agents are defined as indigenous and pre-Islamic.[15]
Even beyond this, the contrast between the rituals in South Asia and Java seem stark at first, even if in both rituals a commensal meal is preceded by a du'a (supplication): on one side is a ritual predominantly convened by women, centred on a holy book, the Qur’an, in which all the congregants present participate in the reading and the hosts' intention is often not declared publicly. On the other side is a male-dominated ritual in which a single person chants an Islamic prayer and pronounces a statement on behalf of the hosts regarding the food and intention of the ritual.[16] In the khatam qur’an a portion of food blessed should be dedicated to the poor if it is to constitute a proper offering rather than merely a feast. In the slametan the spirits are said to partake of the fragrance of the food and incense.

More recent scholarly revisions of earlier interpretations of the slametan have. however, recuperated its Islamic dimensions and with it, its direct connection to South Asia, particularly South India. Mark Woodward in particular has argued that rather than being understood as a synthesis of animism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam, in which animism is numerically and conceptually predominant,[17] the slametan can be seen to be derived directly from Sufi texts and interpretations. Like others, Woodward rejects the tripartite division between the Abangan, Santri and Prijaji in Java in favour a simple distinction between santri and kejawen.Instead, he argues,

The distinction between santri and kejawen is a culturally specific instance of the recurrent tension between shar'iah- minded and mystical interpretation characteristic of Sunni Islam. Both derive from the Qur’an and the emulation of Muhammad, claiming to capture the true meaning of Islam.[18]

The santri support the less knowledgeable kejawen, as one santri told Woodward: 'I take pity on Javanese people because they don't know any Arabic and cannot pray properly. I want to help them so I pray for them at slametan and when they die'.[19] Indeed, according to Woodward both groups consider the slametan to be a Muslim ritual. Against Geertz's view, not only are ritual meals characteristic of Islam and authorised by the scriptures; the hadiths, the sayings of the Prophet, mention feeding the poor as meritorious and, indeed according to Woodward, 'Kejawen Muslims take pains to invite poor people to slametan or, at least, to send them some of the food. Many also donate uncooked rice and other foods to augment the small amounts of sacred food distributed at the ritual'.[20] They regard spontaneous piety as of greater value than that regarded by the Shari’ah.

At this point in his article Woodward draws an explicit connection between the slametan, also known as kenduri, and the Indo-Persian kanduri, also practised elsewhere (Malaysia, Aceh). Meaning feast, it derives etymologically from the Persian word for incense.[21] Woodward adds that

With the exception of rites required by the shari’ah the kanduri is the most common ritual in Malay, Achenese, and South Indian Islam. In all these societies the kanduri is remarkably uniform. Like the slametan it includes recitation of portions of the Qur’an, the distribution of blessed food, and prayers for saints and the local community.[22]

John Bowen describes the kenduri in Gayo, Sumatra, in a similar way to the slametan and even draws a comparison with the khatam qur’an.[23] In the light of the reach of the kanduriritual, Woodward comments, the slametan,while being local, may also be regarded, as part of a much wider transcultural tradition paralleling that of the shari’ah.Furthermore, he argues, the slametan is not primarily a village ritual and is not limited to the kejawenmcommunity. Indeed, most royal rituals are elaborate slametans, suggesting a strong link between court and village community.[24] There are many other resemblances across vast geographical areas: of the ritual aim of peace and blessing for the community following a supplication, and even the kind of foods offered (mainly rice in various forms). Hence not only scriptures but also such local rituals can 'travel' from one place to another.

The intersection of gender and class

Alongside this revision of the Islamic nature of the slametan has come a revision in the role played by women in the slametan, from being an all-male affair to something a lot more complex. The khatam qur’an obviously demands a certain proficiency and literacy in reading Arabic. Most Pakistani women in Manchester do not know Arabic, but they have been taught to read the Qur’an accurately. This accuracy signifies the magical power of the Qur’an: it is not the meaning of the text that is salient but the text's sacred effectiveness to ward off evil spirits and bring barkat (Baraka, blessing) to the hosts and the assembled congregation. Although reading Arabic is an accomplishment not found among women in village Java, in other respects, the rituals enable female-centred networks of sociality much in the same way as among Pakistani women. In a 2007 article, Jan Newberry rejects the view of contemporary slametans in Java as male-dominated rituals. As she says,

The slametan has been described as a ritual focussed on the male head of household as the formal and public representative of a co-resident family group. Hosted out of the main front room of the house, the conventional description of the slametan supported a structuralist reading of the house as split into a front, male, public space and a back, female, private space … By taking the role of the house seriously in the staging of a slametan, we can see this plan of the house is less apt than one that figures its role as conduit to community exchange relationships managed by both males and females.[25]

slametans

slametan.

A focus on the front door and the people fed during the slametan is only a partial picture; it is the flow of women, resources, services, and food through the back door—before, during, and after—that makes the slametan possible. And this reciprocal, mutually reinforcing flow of resources and aid defines houses less as discrete structures than as nodes and conduits in a network of neighbourly exchange and connection.[26]

Focusing our attention on the distribution of food, rather than the symbolic aspects of ritual, it becomes clear that the real mediators of interhousehold relationships in the slametan are the women and not the men. The women buy, cook, and make the decisions as to how the food will be distributed, the latter a task often more complex than Geertz's description might imply.[27]

slametan

slametans.

kenduris.

Khatme qur’an

Whereas the official, public, communal sphere is almost exclusively an adult male domain, involving at any one time only a small segment of the adult population, the interdomestic domain catches up almost everyone, men and women alike; and it is mostly women who dominate here through the managing of ritual, labour and gift exchange networks. Through these interdomestic networks, equality and inequality, friendship, caste, biraderi, and class find their daily expression. A man's status thus remains for most men who are not active politically crucially anchored in this interdomestic realm, in large measure controlled by his wife.

Women, literacy and Islam

Most of the Pakistani women I knew were able to read the Qur’an in Arabic, though without understanding its meaning, and could thus participate in khatam Qur’an rituals. For Pakistani women who cannot read the Qur’an, however, equivalent rituals are substituted, much as in the slametan, relying on a leader to lead the religious part of the ritual. For example, in a ritual known as 'the story of Bibi Fatima (bibi fatima ki kahani), the leader tells the story of miraculous events in the life of Fatima, the Prophet Muhammad's daughter. Pakistani women, including middle-class literate women, also convene mehfil el milad gatherings to recite poems praising the life of the Prophet Muhammad, with the audience joining in refrains following the main reciter.[32]

As Islamic reform movements have spread from the Middle East to South Asia, there are those who reject the familiar Pakistani khatam qur’an ritual on the grounds that the readers don't understand the words of the Qur’an in Arabic. In other words, the magical quality of the Qur’an, as an efficacious sacred object with the agency to protect, heal and bless, is challenged by the reformists. Instead, reformist women told me, they hold a dars in which a leader reads and interprets verses from the Qur’an, often in front of a mixed audience of men and women (middle class khatam rituals were often mixed in the past as well). This is followed, I was told, in the usual way, with a du’'a and a meal which constitutes a food offering.

Throughout Southeast Asia too, female literacy, and with it the capacity to read the Qur’an, have spread widely. In Malaysia, for example, one author reports that the kenduri has changed from being male centred in the rural context to having exclusively female rituals in the urban context, called majlis doa.[33] There are ceremonies in Malaysia for the completion of reading the Qur’an called khatam Qur’an, as in Pakistan,[34] but Malaysians do not seem to convene separate khatam rituals. In Jakarta, Indonesia, Anne Rasmussen has studied events convened by elite women in which, as one reviewer of her book sums up the argument, the women 'embody, encode, and enact the sound of the recited Qur’an in ways that transmit knowledge of Islamic texts and aural experiences of the divine through female subjectivities'.[35] Though Rasmussen connects the holding of khatam Qur’an in Indonesia to Arab rather than South Asian sources, the events she describes resemble their Pakistani counterpart in that the Qur’an is recited as a collective oral performance; in this case by 30 qari’as (female reciters) in under an hour, in a 'tapestry of human voices'[36] that produces 'heterogeneous textures of sound'.[37]

The resulting 'dense cacophony' of voices described by Rasmussen differs, however, radically from the soft murmur of the Qur’an reading characterising Pakistani khatams.[38] Nevertheless, through such recitations women are said by Rasmussen to create a 'gendered sphere'.[39] The author links the emergence of khatamc elebrations in Jakarta to the broader rise of Islamic feminists in Indonesia. Despite similarities, the one khatam Qur’an event Rasmussen describes in detail, however, differed from the usual Pakistani khatam qur’an: it was an elite event in which the Qur’an was recited by accomplished female expert Qur’anic singers, dedicated to several causes simultaneously: thanksgiving for the health of one woman, blessing the child of another, praying for the health of a third, celebrating the circumcision of a woman's son, and 'many, many other reasons'.[40] Although not mentioned, one can only assume that the reading is followed by a prayer and a ritual meal.

Concluding remarks

Beyond the differences between slametans, khatam qur’an and other domestic rituals centred on a single household throughout South Asia and Indonesia, I have pointed in this to paper to the striking similarities scholars have identified in the way that such rituals allow for the creation of an everyday interdomestic domain controlled in large measure by women and based on female networking. Class and gender intersect in such networks, allowing for different configurations of inter-household relations in villages, neighbourhoods and urban contexts. If the slametan was an extension of South Indian kanduri celebrations, the contemporary spread of communal Qur’an readings to Indonesia highlights the continuing interconnections across the Muslim world as these affect women's capacities to network beyond the constricted, restricted domestic domain.

Notes

Acknowledgements. This paper was first presented at a conference on 'Islam, Gender Relations and Women's Agency: An India-Indonesia comparative study' at the Australian National University convened by Kathryn Robinson. I am grateful to Kathy and the conference participants for their comments. The paper draws on my earlier book, The Migration Process, (Bloomsbury 1990 / 2002), which was based on long-term research in the Pakistani diaspora in the UK.

All URLs in these references were operational when the paper was first published.

[1] Clifford Geertz, The Religion of Java, Glencoe: The Free Press, 1960, p. 11.

[2] The one exception I found was in an article by Regina Qureshi on Canada in which she calls the khatam qur’an qur’an khwani. See Regula B. Qureshi, 'Transcending space: Recitation and community among South Asian Muslims in Canada,' in Making Muslim Space in North America and Europe, edited by Barbara Daly Metcalf, 46–64, Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1986, 56–58.

[3] Robert R. Jay, Javanese Villagers: Social Relations in Rural Modjukoto, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1969, pp. 188–238.

[4] Geertz, The Religion of Java, p. 1.

[5] On one form of this ritual, see Audrey Hayley, 'A commensal relationship with God: The nature of the offering in Assamese Vaishnavism,' in Sacrifice, edited by M.F.C. Bourdillon and Meyer Fortes, 107–26, London: Academic Press 1980.

[6] Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss, Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function, London: Cohen and West, 964 [1898], p. 14.

[7] Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1960, s.v. barkat or baraka.

[8] Luc de Heusch, Sacrifice in Africa: A Structuralist Approach, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985, p. 213.

[9] de Heusch has recently criticised this contrast. See de Heusch, Sacrifice in Africa, p. 213.

[10] T.H. Weir, 'Sacrifice (Islamic),' in Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, edited by James Hastings, Edinburgh: T.H. Clark, 1908.

[11] Jonathan P. Parry, 'Ghosts, greed and sin: The occupational identity of Benares funeral priests,' Man (N.S.) 15 (1980): 88–111.

[12] For a structural analysis of the processual form of a sacrifice see Richard Werbner, Ritual Passage Sacred Journey: The Process and Organization of Religious Movement, Washington, DC: Smithsonian, 1989.

[13] Pnina Werbner, 'Economic rationality and hierarchical gift economies: Value and ranking among British Pakistanis,' Man (N.S.) 25(2) (1990): 266–85.

[14] Geertz, The Religion of Java, p. 11.

[15] In this regard it is instructive to compare contemporary beliefs in Pakistan and Indonesia documented in the 2012 Pew Foundation survey. According to the survey, belief in jinns is higher in Pakistan (77 to 53 per cent), somewhat lower on sorcery (50 to 69 per cent), higher on the evil eye (61 to 29 per cent), and much higher on the use of talismans and other charms (41 to 4 per cent). Virtually all Pakistanis and Indonesians display Qur’anic verses in their homes (90 and 88 per cent), while slightly more Pakistanis use traditional healers (55 to 38 per cent). Only 7 per cent in Pakistan and 20 per cent in Indonesia have witnessed an exorcism of evil spirits.

[16] According to van den Boogert, before the prayers the host delivers an ujub, 'an opening speech in which he states the purity of his intentions, the specific purpose of the slametan (e.g. the seventh month of the pregnancy of his daughter), and apologises for his lack of eloquence and the inadequacy of the food.' See Jochem van den Boogert, 'The role of slametan in the discourse on Javanese Islam,' Indonesia and the Malay World vol. 45, no. 133 (2017): 352–72, p. 354.

[17] Mark R. Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' History of Religions 28(1) (1988): 54–89, p. 55.

[18] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 56.

[19] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 62.

[20] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 63.

[21] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 64.

[22] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 65.

[23] John Bowen describes the kenduri in Gayo, Sumatra, similarly to the slametan and even draws a comparison with the khatam qur’an. See John R. Bowen, Muslims Through Discourse,Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993, p. 230, note.

[24] Woodward, 'The Slametan: Textual knowledge and ritual performance in Central Javanese Islam,' p. 85.

[25] Jan Newberry, 'Rituals of rule in the administered community: The Javanese slametan reconsidered,' Modern Asian Studies vol. 41, no. 6 (2007): 1295&$8211;329, p. 1311.

[26] Newberry, 'Rituals of rule in the administered community: The Javanese slametan reconsidered,' p. 1311.

[27] Ann Stoler, 'Class Structure and Female Autonomy in Rural Java,' Signs 3(1) (1977): 74–89, p. 86.

[28] Pnina Werbner, The Migration Process: Capital, Gifts and Offerings among British Pakistanis,2nd edition with new preface, Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2002 [1990].

[29] For a similar domain of gift exchange in Java see Vibeke Asmussen, 'Constructing gender and local morality: exchange practices in a Javanese village,' Indonesia and the Malay World 32(94) (2004): 315–29.

[30] See, for example Bianca Smith, cited in Robert W. Hefner, 'Review: Islam in Indonesia, Post-Suharto: The struggle for the Sunni Center,' Indonesia 86 (2008): 139–60, p. 147.

[31] Judith Nagata, 'Adat in the city: Some perceptions and practices among urban Malays,' Anthropologica xvi (1974): 91–109, p. 97.

[32] See also Regula B. Qureshi, 'Transcending space: Recitation and community among South Asian Muslims in Canada,' in Making Muslim Space in North America and Europe, edited by Barbara Daly Metcalf, 46–64, Berkeley CA: University of California Press, pp. 53–55.

[33] Sven Cederroth, 'Plurality, tolerance and change in Southeast Asian Islam,' NIAS 4 (2004): 4–5, p. 4

[34] See Nagata, 'Adat in the city: Some perceptions and practices among urban Malays,' p. 94.

[35] Shayna Silverstein, 'Women, the Recited Qur’an and Islamic Music in Indonesia (Review),' Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 8(2) (2012): 105–07, p. 105.

[36] Anne Rasmussen, Women, the Recited Qur’an, and Islamic Music in Indonesia, Berkeley CA: University of California Press, p. 83.

[37] Silverstein, 'Women, the Recited Qur’an and Islamic Music in Indonesia (Review),' p. 106.

[38] Rasmussen, Women, the Recited Qur’an, and Islamic Music in Indonesia, p. 83.

[39] Silverstein, 'Women, the Recited Qur’an and Islamic Music in Indonesia (Review),' p. 106.

[40] Rasmussen, Women, the Recited Qur’an, and Islamic Music in Indonesia, p. 82.

Published with the support of Gender and Cultural Studies, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University.
URL: http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue43/werbner.html
© Copyright
Page constructed by Carolyn Brewer
Last modified: 29 July 2019 1111